Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thank you, Elizabeth Warren

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
roxiejules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:18 PM
Original message
Thank you, Elizabeth Warren
for standing up for the people & speaking the truth even as you were repeatedly and insanely battered by the GOP.
















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. +1000% ---
Elizabeth Warren would do an honest and fair job -- presume she understands

that she wouldn't be permitted to do it given corporate pressures on government ---

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ahhh, you know she NEVER wanted the job, right? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You kow this how , personal freind ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. "Warren made it clear to the White House... she was not interested in a five-year term"
"Elizabeth Warren made it clear to the White House while it was debating her nomination to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that she was not interested in a five-year term to run the agency. Barney Frank, a Warren ally, delivered that message to the White House, he told HuffPost in an interview Thursday.

"She always said she didn't want to be there as a permanent director. Some of the liberals are worried about it. It's almost an insult to Elizabeth. She wouldn't take this if there was the slightest impediment to her doing the job," he said."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/16/warren-didnt-want-permane_n_719932.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Probably ... as I just described ... because she wouldn't be permitted to do the job honestly ...!!
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 10:46 PM by defendandprotect
If, in fact, the job was offered and if in fact she has said she doesn't want it --

Any link to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Why would she take a job the is begrudging given, Obama/Giethner never wanted her.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 11:04 PM by bahrbearian
It remimds me of how they treated Van Jones and Howard Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roxiejules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. She was brave and smart
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 11:14 PM by roxiejules
http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-14/bostonglobe/29774296_1_consumer-financial-protection-bureau-setti-warren-elizabeth-warren


“Did (the White House) squander an opportunity to make the Elizabeth Warren nomination a defining battle? Big time,’’ said one Senate Democratic adviser who is close to the Warren drama.

The president “hasn’t been willing to spend the political capital to fight for her,’’ added Theresa Amato, executive director of Citizens Works, a nonprofit consumer protection agency founded by Ralph Nader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yes, she was a bone
thrown to the Progressives of the Party. And now she is gone. I wish she were Prez.

I really wish Strickland (previous gov. of Ohio) would primary Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Exactly!! -- and it would certainly be unlike Obama who favors putting foxes in charge ....
of government agencies --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r We love you Elizabeth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. She's wonderful.
Anyone against her is just shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. For her to be placed in such a position
of trust she must first agree to accept wide spread criminality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. She is the opposite of the status quo.... Thanks for showing us what that looks like..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. +10000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Elizabeth Warren is totally my write-in. I heart her. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Me too.
It is nice to see what a REAL DEMOCRAT looks like.
There are so few these days.
The really sad thing is that Warren Stands Out so far from the rest of the politicians in Washington.
Thank You, Elizabeth.



Who will STAND and FIGHT for THIS American Majority?
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Sanders/ Warren or Warren / Sanders 2012!
They would have my vote. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R'd. A true hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roxiejules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. The 'Brooksley Born' Rerun
Congress prevents another smart woman from attempting to rein in banksters:

http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2009/marapr...


More recently, as analysts sort out the origins of what has become the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, Born has emerged as a sort of modern-day Cassandra. Some people believe the debacle could have been averted or muted had Greenspan and others followed her advice.

Ultimately, Greenspan and the other regulators foiled Born’s efforts, and Congress took the extraordinary step of enacting legislation that prohibited her agency from taking any action. Born left government and returned to her private law practice in Washington.

Born recalls taking a phone call from Lawrence Summers, then Rubin’s top deputy at the Treasury Department, complaining about the proposal, and mentioning that he was taking heat from industry lobbyists. She was not dissuaded. “Of course, we were an independent regulatory agency,” she says.

The debate came to a head April 21, 1998. In a Treasury Department meeting of a presidential working group that included Born and the other top regulators, Greenspan and Rubin took turns attempting to change her mind. Rubin took the lead, she recalls.

“I was told by the secretary of the treasury that the CFTC had no jurisdiction, and for that reason and that reason alone, we should not go forward,” Born says. “I told him . . . that I had never heard anyone assert that we didn’t have statutory jurisdiction . . . and I would be happy to see the legal analysis he was basing his position on.”



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC