Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

66 Years After Nagasaki: Danger and Decadence in the Atomic Age

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
CountSnail Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 04:39 PM
Original message
66 Years After Nagasaki: Danger and Decadence in the Atomic Age
Sixty six years ago today, the Japanese city of Nagasaki experienced the repugnant power of the world's second atomic weapon strike. The United States, in an effort to bring WWII to a sudden and definitive end, had dropped the world's first nuclear weapon, "Little Boy", on the industrial city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. The attack on Hiroshima was quickly followed up by the detonation of the "Fat Man" bomb over Nagasaki on August 9th. Japan surrendered to the United States on August 15th. Although the two bombings killed at least 225,000 people, they may have actually saved a lot of lives. As ironic and dark as that sounds, it is estimated that about 250,000 American soldiers, along with a whopping 1,000,000 Japanese civilians, would've been killed if the war had ended with an all out invasion of Japan. This was and still is one of the primary arguments given in order to justify the world's only two nuclear attacks thus far.


Although nukes may have "saved the day" in WWII, they have since become the world's greatest source of apocalyptic fear, overzealous intimidation, and monetary waste...

http://moyerboard.blogspot.com/2011/08/danger-and-decadence-in-atomic-age.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Permanut Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. The "saved a lot of lives" meme has been around
all of my lifetime; I was born in 1945. It seems, though, that the entire story is a little more complicated. The Japanese, for example, had communicated with Soviet officials in July about the possibility for surrender. It is not clear that an invasion would have been necessary. There is a lot more to the story, but the version I learned included a sanitized version of Allied tactics and strategy.

Nevertheless, it is important to remember those events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountSnail Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yup
"Nevertheless, it is important to remember those events."

I agree. They've had a profound impact on the world we live in today. Mainly for the worst, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We've been lied to for a l-o-n-g time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC