Deportations upset media groups

[question everything]

Foreign journalists aren't obtaining visas to enter U.S.

By Andrea Almond
ASSOCIATED PRESS

July 12, 2004

LOS ANGELES – When freelance journalist Elena Lappin boarded United Airlines Flight 935 from London to Los Angeles International Airport, she envisioned exploring the City of Angels and succumbing to its laid-back charm. Instead, the most Lappin saw of the city on her truncated trip in May were glimpses of nighttime urban Los Angeles through the metal bars of a security van.

Detained upon arrival by immigration officials, then clapped in handcuffs, the British national was told she would have to be deported. Her crime: entering the country to research a story without a special press visa she didn't know she needed.

The 49-year-old reporter on assignment for London's Guardian newspaper was transported to a downtown detention facility and locked in a cell behind a thick glass wall. There was no bed, no chair, just two steel benches and a toilet in full view of passers-by. She spent 26 hours in detention before being shipped back to Britain... Lappin's case is not isolated. During the past 18 months, at least 18 journalists from "friendly" countries have been seized at U.S. airports and forcibly deported.

(snip)

At issue is a regulation requiring journalists from 27 "friendly" nations to obtain special visas, called I-visas, while other citizens of those same countries can enter America without a visa for as long as 90 days.

More..


Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040712/news_1n12deported.html

[ewagner]

1. It really has started

hasn't it?

Total control of the press...........

[DAGDA56]

2. What if a journalist from the UK decides to declare he/she is a tourist?

and then writes a story later? Does it matter if you work for the Guardian or the BBC?

[struggle4progress]

3. Society of Professional Journalists Calls on State Department ...

... to Continue Renewing Visas to Foreign Journalists

Tue Jul 6 12:11:58 2004 Pacific Time

INDIANAPOLIS, July 6 (AScribe Newswire) -- The Society of Professional Journalists has learned of the recent decision of the State Department to discontinue its domestic reissuance service for nonimmigrant I visas (foreign media representatives).

Each year roughly 20,000 I visas are provided to international journalists to come and visit the United States for reports, interviews and other news coverage. In addition thousands of accredited foreign reporters are semi-permanently stationed in the United States. The discontinuance of the reissuance service will directly affect the semi-permanently stationed reporters, while bringing havoc upon the many that visit us on short notice. Currently a renewal of an I visa in the United States will take sometimes four to six months, while renewing an I visa abroad at a U.S. consulate may take four to six weeks, and in some cases longer. Neither situation provides a professional journalist with a realistic option for renewal of his visa status. Foreign journalists travel, and cannot do their work without proper travel documents.

SPJ is very concerned that this action prompts reciprocal actions by foreign governments to American journalists living and working overseas. We remind the U.S. government that this regulation creates a serious gap in information about the United States for overseas viewers and readers, and about the world for American news consumers. Such a vacuum of responsible reporting provides opportunities for rumors and innuendo instead of facts. Moreover, if American journalists are limited in their ability to work overseas, due to introduction of reciprocal restrictions, we are directly deprived from our news sources as well, and fewer reports from abroad will reach the United States for our audiences. American journalists are stationed in almost every country and many nations have reporters stationed in the United States, or dispatch daily journalists to the States for coverage of spot or breaking news. Both depend highly on the mutual courtesy and flexibility of the respective governments to assure swift and accurate international reporting.

SPJ reminds the U.S. government that by deploying an extremely short term to introduce the new rule, many foreign media representatives semi-permanently stationed in the U.S., and most foreign journalists who may get coverage assignments, will not know about the new rule. This will create additional conflicts and confusion for all parties concerned. In addition, many American journalists stationed abroad may also be suddenly confronted with embarrassing, unpleasant and unjustified decisions of foreign governments taking retaliatory actions.
<more>

http://www.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/spew4th.pl?ascribeid=20040706.113034&time=12%2012%20PDT&year=2004&public=1