Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ's Al Hunt: Bagging Bin Laden

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-04 12:57 AM
Original message
WSJ's Al Hunt: Bagging Bin Laden
Edited on Fri Jul-16-04 01:18 PM by Skinner
July 15, 2004; Page A11

Isnip)

Near the top of this GOP wish list is eliminating Osama bin Laden. Last week, The New Republic reported the administration has demanded the Pakistani government get bin Laden before the election, preferably during the Democratic convention this month; the story was officially denied but had a ring of authenticity. A Bush re-election hinges on a majority of Americans seeing him as a tough commander in chief winning the war on terrorism, whatever the temporary travails in Iraq. These Republicans think, or at least hope, that getting bin Laden, especially if the president can argue simultaneously that may have thwarted an attack on America, could do the trick.

(snip)

Dick Clarke believes that apprehending bin Laden "won't make a hell of a lot of difference at this point." As the former anti-terrorism chief for Presidents Clinton and Bush, nobody knows al Qaeda better. Osama, he says, "is pretty much a figurehead now." Indeed, he thinks bin Laden could be more lethal as a martyr than as a recluse in hiding. "Think Che Guevera," he notes citing the Cuban Marxist leader who became a larger-than-life poster boy for guerrilla movements after he was killed.

(snip)

There was a serious shot at killing the top al-Qaeda leaders in 2001, when they were trapped in the mountainous Afghanistan-Pakistan border region of Tora Bora; but in a huge blunder, the Americans, with insufficient forces, sent Afghans to do the job and bin Laden and the others escaped. "It might have made more of a difference if we'd gotten him then," suggests Mr. Clarke. That he has been able to elude the powerful United States for three years has become part of the terrorist network folklore.

(snip)

That's a great success if the terrorist threat chiefly centers on al Qaeda as a global network run by bin Laden. But that's not the case, says Jason Burke, a British journalist who has written a highly praised book on al Qaeda. Instead, he says it is "a small group of hardened militants who came together in Afghanistan in the late '90s under the leadership of bin Laden, ran a number of training camps there and managed to commission and execute a series of attacks culminating in September 11th." That al Qaeda, he adds, was shattered by the U.S. "is largely peripheral in terms of modern Islamic terror."

(snip)

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB108985366699364382,00.html


mailto:al.hunt@wsj.com


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-04 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting as much as you did,but
you have to be a subscriber to get the entire article.

The Page You Requested Is Available Only to Subscribers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hi "Question." Good article but please remember DU copyright rules.
"DU copyright rules require that excerpts of
copyrighted material be limited to four paragraphs."


Thanks much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC