Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman and Kly form new Committee on the Present Danger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 09:57 PM
Original message
Lieberman and Kly form new Committee on the Present Danger
This constitutes a "present danger" for Kerry's election chances, IMO. I am interested in how other DUers see this??

Here is the link and the opening grafs:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63067-2004Jul19.html

The Present Danger

By Joe Lieberman and Jon Kyl

Tuesday, July 20, 2004; Page A17

The successful handover of sovereignty to the Iraqi people last month offers fresh hope for stability and democracy in their country, but it could also mark a turning of the tide in the world war against terrorism. While the deposed tyrant and terrorist Saddam Hussein stands trial, the people of the great Muslim country he suppressed for so long are now standing proud and free, and taking control of their own destiny. And they are showing strong support for their new leadership and new optimism about their democratic future. According to a BBC/Oxford Research International poll released this month, 55 percent of Iraqis believe their lives today are quite good or very good, 56 percent believe their lives will get better in the next year, and 70 percent believe Iraq needs democracy.
These survey results are significant because they show we are making real progress in the war of values and ideas in Iraq, ideas that are at the heart of the larger war on terrorism. Iraq has become a proving ground for the freedom and security we are fighting for, and a tough test of our resolve in this fight. The terrorists in Iraq and beyond will never beat us militarily. But they can defeat us politically if they succeed in their strategy to terrorize, demoralize and divide America and its allies.
The liberation of Iraq has important implications for the region and for the broader war on terrorism. The leaders of the Democratic and Republican parties have so far stood firm in their commitment to finish the job in Iraq and to fight to victory the war on terrorism. But that bipartisan consensus is coming under growing public pressure and could fray in the months ahead. Although the tide is turning in the war on terrorism, a political undertow in this country could wash out our recent gains. We must not let this happen.
To make sure it doesn't, we are relaunching today the Committee on the Present Danger, a group of citizens of diverse political persuasions who will work to sustain and strengthen bipartisan support for the war on terrorism in Iraq and beyond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. read some antithetical views of the CPD ... seems PNAC-ish to me
Edited on Tue Jul-20-04 10:56 PM by cosmicdot
of course, Mr. Lieberman and Mr. Kyl are free to quote President John F. Kennedy ... I don't appreciate them inferencing him with the intent of the 3rd wave of this organization.

Lieberman is so comfortable around these people - much like he is serving on the Nixon Center Board with Kissinger and others.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030627123835/nixoncenter.org/boardac.htm

It's behavior by people like Joe Lieberman that cause me to not trust the DLC.


"The successful handover of sovereignty to the Iraqi people..."

From what source does the United States get the power to give and take sovereignty, Messrs. Lieberman and Kyl? It wasn't ours to take away. We have no power to give it back. So nice of Messrs. Lieberman/Kyl to fail to mention this; and, other violations of international law.

It's another Neo-Con think tank/advocate group.


1970s: Scoop Jackson was a war hawk.


"The Committee on the Present Danger was an American bi-partisan, conservative, anti-Communist, militarist lobbying group.

The committee first met in 1950, it was founded by Tracy Vorhees who had served as undersecretary of the United States Army.

It lost influence throughout the 1960s, but it was revived in 1976 when a sub-group, Team B, was set up by Gerald Ford, working out of the offices of the Coalition for a Democratic Majority. The sub-group produced the "National Intelligence Estimates" report in 1976, a report countering the existing CIA estimates of Soviet military capacities. It grew in influence following the election of Carter, with Nitze as chairman of policy studies."

The committee provided thirty-three officials of the Reagan administration including William Casey, Richard Allen, Jeane Kirkpatrick Jeane Jordan, John Lehman, George Shultz and Richard Perle.

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Committee%20on%20the%20Present%20Danger

Committee on the Present Danger

"The Committee on the Present Danger (CPD) is a hawkish "advocacy organization" first founded in 1950 and re-formed in 1976 to push for larger defense budgets and arms buildups, to counter the Soviet Union. In June 2004, The Hill reported that a third incarnation of CPD was being planned, to address the War on terrorism. The head of the 2004 CPD, PR pro and former Reagan adviser Peter Hannaford, explained, "we saw a parallel” between the Soviet threat and the threat from terrorism. The message that CPD will convey through lobbying, media work and conferences is that “the war on terror needs to be won,” he said.

Known members of the 2004 CPD include Peter Hannaford, Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, former CIA director R. James Woolsey, Jr., and Reagan administration official and 1976 Committee founder Max M. Kampelman. At the July 20 launching of the 2004 CPD, Lieberman and Senator Jon Kyl were identified as the honorary co-chairs. Other notable members listed on the CPD website include Laurie Mylroie, Norman Podhoretz, Frank Gaffney and other associates of the American Enterprise Institute, Heritage Foundation, American-Israel Public Affairs Committee and the Boeing Company.

~more here~
http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Committee_on_the_Present_Danger


Here's one anti-thesis:

Desperate Neo-Cons Launch Third

`Committee on the Present Danger'

by Michele Steinberg

"It could have been called "The Committee To Blow Up the World." On June 16, for the third time since World War II, the proponents of preventive war launched a massive propaganda campaign using the moniker "The Committee on the Present Danger." The CPD's rebirth took place at a gathering of 80-100 of Washington's leading neo-cons to discuss "Iraq and the War Against Terrorism." The midwife was Clifford May, the president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), which sponsored the event; the leading ideologue was William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard; and the arrival was proudly announced by Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman (Conn.), who said that the CPD's creation "for the third time," was necessary because "today, in America, support for the war is in jeopardy" (see EIR, June 25). The piggy-bank for the event, at least in part, was Australian-British media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who owns the publications, and FOX-TV networks, by which most of the speakers are paid.

"There was only one real reason for the gathering: Bush and Cheney are in increasing trouble, and "Super Watergate" is in the air. It was an attempted regroupment by the angry neo-cons, who were trying to recoup their losses after the Administration turned against their chosen Iraqi leader, Ahmed Chalabi, and who were furious that the Administration had returned to the United Nations for a resolution.

"Speakers had a stark message: war, war, more war; and kill, kill, kill more Muslims. And despite overwhelming evidence that this kind of "counter-terrorist" policy is increasing the danger to the United States and to global stability, this gathering said that Dick Cheney's doctrine of preventive war is not being applied hard enough. Throughout the day-long event, one heard a spiel for imperial policy, and a chilling threat: If the Cheney policy is abandoned, there will be another 9/11—this time much worse."


~snip~

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2004/3126cpd_iii.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the links. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC