An Army Whitewash (WashPost Editorial)

[coda]

EDITORIAL

An Army Whitewash

Saturday, July 24, 2004; Page A20


THE ARMY'S attempt to hold itself accountable for the abuse of foreign prisoners is off to a terrible start. On Thursday, while the media and political worlds were focused on the report of the Sept. 11 commission, the Army inspector general released a 300-page summary of an investigation of "detainee operations" in Iraq and Afghanistan. Though it identified 94 cases of confirmed or possible abuse, including 20 prisoner deaths, the probe concluded by sounding the defense offered up by the Pentagon ever since the photographs from Abu Ghraib prison were published: that the crimes did not result from Army policy and were not the fault of senior commanders but were "unauthorized actions taken by a few individuals."



This conclusion is contradicted by the independent investigations and reports of the International Committee of the Red Cross, by an earlier Army investigation undertaken before the scandal became public, and by testimony given to Congress. Oddly, it doesn't even square with some of the findings buried in the inspector general's own report, which confirm that commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan ordered "high-risk" interrogation procedures to be used on prisoners without adequate safeguards, training or regard for the Geneva Conventions.

No matter: The report effectively communicates the strategy of the military brass on the detainee affair, which is to focus blame on a few low-ranking personnel, shield all senior commanders from accountability, and deny or bury any facts that interfere with these aims. In that sense, the signal it sends to Congress is clear: The Pentagon cannot be counted on to reliably or thoroughly investigate the prisoner abuse affair. An independent probe by an outside authority is desperately needed.



more......

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10456-2004Jul23.html

[Knurled99]

1. The "military" and the "army" are not the same thing..

It seems to me that the Army itself and not the military as a whole has been making alot of big mistakes in the last few years. Their soldiers repeatedly get into trouble or get hurt due to lack of training, low morale, etc. Their numbers are way, way down which means they will take just about anyone into their ranks. Looks like our government ought to take some interest in why our Army has these problems and perhaps take steps to improve the situation.

[LittleApple81]

2. But in a situation like this isn't the army the one providing the

majority of the "face-to-face" contact with the Iraqi population? And what I can see the investigation is done by the Pentagon... For whatever reason this investigation is not being conducted as it should (from somebody outside of army or military) and it leaves a bad taste in people's mouths.
I watched the hearings... a shameful performance if I ever saw one.