Krugman: Ignorance Isn't Strength

[RamboLiberal]

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/08/opinion/08krugman.html?pagewanted=print&position=

I first used the word "Orwellian" to describe the Bush team in October 2000. Even then it was obvious that George W. Bush surrounds himself with people who insist that up is down, and ignorance is strength. But the full costs of his denial of reality are only now becoming clear.

President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have an unparalleled ability to insulate themselves from inconvenient facts. They lead a party that controls all three branches of government, and face news media that in some cases are partisan supporters, and in other cases are reluctant to state plainly that officials aren't telling the truth. They also still enjoy the residue of the faith placed in them after 9/11.

This has allowed them to engage in what Orwell called "reality control." In the world according to the Bush administration, our leaders are infallible, and their policies always succeed. If the facts don't fit that assumption, they just deny the facts.

As a political strategy, reality control has worked very well. But as a strategy for governing, it has led to predictable disaster. When leaders live in an invented reality, they do a bad job of dealing with real reality.

[theorist]

1. Could you imagine a */C administration during the height of the Cold War?

We might not be here, or as in 1984, a relatively small scale nuclear war would have led us into a despotic autocracy. I don't think * would make a good Big Brother, though.

[johan helge]

2. Or during the Cuba crisis ....

[drfemoe]

3. Krugman sharpened his pencil before he wrote this one . eom