Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT - from today's editorial....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 05:49 AM
Original message
NYT - from today's editorial....
Edited on Sat Jul-12-03 05:51 AM by sfecap
(snip)

So far, the administration's handling of this important — and politically explosive — issue has mostly involved a great deal of finger-pointing instead of an exacting reconstruction of events and an acceptance of blame by all those responsible. Mr. Bush himself engaged in the free-for-all yesterday while traveling in Africa when he said his speech had been "cleared by the intelligence services." That led within a few hours to Mr. Tenet's mea culpa.

It is clear, however, that much more went into this affair than the failure of the C.I.A. to pounce on the offending 16 words in Mr. Bush's speech. A good deal of information already points to a willful effort by the war camp in the administration to pump up an accusation that seemed shaky from the outset and that was pretty well discredited long before Mr. Bush stepped into the well of the House of Representatives last January. Doubts about the accusation were raised in March 2002 by Joseph Wilson 4th, a former American diplomat, after he was dispatched to Niger by the C.I.A. to look into the issue.

Mr. Wilson has said he is confident that his concerns were circulated not only within the agency but also at the State Department and the office of Vice President Dick Cheney. Mr. Tenet, in his statement yesterday, confirmed that the Wilson findings had been given wide distribution, although he reported that Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney and other high officials had not been directly informed about them by the C.I.A. The uranium charge should never have found its way into Mr. Bush's speech. Determining how it got there is essential to understanding whether the administration engaged in a deliberate effort to mislead the nation about the Iraqi threat.


http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/12/opinion/12SAT1.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. DUers knew this was fallacious when Bush said it
How did we know and not the Prez and Chimp back during the SOTUA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Someone made the mistake of speaking to Mrs. Alan Greenspan
But U.S. officials told NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell that Tenet himself advised Rice’s top deputy, Steven Hadley, to remove a reference to the uranium report from a speech Bush delivered Oct. 7 in Cincinnati, establishing that the nation’s top intelligence officials suspected that the allegation was false more than three months before they approved Bush’s repeating it in his nationally televised address on Jan. 28.

The Washington Post reported Friday that the CIA also told British officials about its doubts and passed word along to several U.S. agencies before the State of the Union address.

http://msnbc.com/news/937524.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickDanger Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Very good rebuttal to 'the CIA should have told me better'
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clarkbarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. The SCREW YORK TIMES will let Chimp off the hook
They always do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC