Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Southern politics, religion and Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:21 AM
Original message
Southern politics, religion and Bush
SignOnSanDiego.com

Southern politics, religion and Bush

By Jerome H. Garris
November 30, 2004

(snip)

For nearly 100 years after the Civil War, most Southern voters rejected the party of Lincoln and voted solidly Democratic in national elections. Following the end of Reconstruction in 1877, Arkansas went 96 years before voting for its first Republican president in 1972. Florida waited 92 years, and Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi and South Carolina held off 88 years each. What finally prompted Southern voting changes was the national Democratic Party's position on civil rights; increasingly, white voters in the South found themselves cut off from a party that no longer seemed to espouse their social agenda.

Southern Democrats Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton temporarily broke up what has become a solid Southern majority for Republican candidates since 1980 as Republicans adopted a domestic social agenda far more palatable to Southerners. The effect was to change the balance of power in presidential elections from Democrat to Republican.

A similar realignment of voting behavior also occurred in congressional elections. From the end of Reconstruction until the mid-1970s, Southern Democrats held a majority of the chairmanships in Congress due to the seniority rule, where the longest serving committee members automatically became chairmen. Because the South was a one-party region with little Republican opposition, Southern Democrats generally served longer, controlled committees, defied the liberal leadership of their own party and regularly held up civil rights and social legislation.

When Democrats eliminated automatic seniority in the mid-70s, Southern Democrats no longer wielded power over liberal party initiatives, reducing the power of Southerners who needed a new means of holding back liberal Democratic programs. They found that bulwark in a party already capturing their presidential votes. Southerners could reason that voting for both Republican presidents and legislators would provide the same bulwark against liberalism that the seniority system had provided.

More..

Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20041130/news_lz1e30garris.html


Garris is director of research at Claremont McKenna College and a member of the government faculty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC