Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Bush Administration Certifiable?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 08:25 PM
Original message
Is the Bush Administration Certifiable?
I know, it's Libertarian, but the Libertarians share my
contempt for the Imperial Reich.


---

We are getting our butts kicked in Iraq, and Bush wants to invade more countries? It is clear as day that we do not have enough troops to deal with Iraq. The 12,000 additional troops "to improve security" are being acquired by extending the combat tours of troops already on duty in Iraq. More US soldiers were killed in Iraq in November than in any previous month. The US is so hard up for troops that the Pentagon is deploying soldiers who have lost arms and legs in combat. On December 1 the Washington Post reported: "US armed forces have recently announced new efforts to keep seriously wounded or disabled soldiers on active duty."

---

According to the US military hospital in Landstuhl, Germany, the hospital has treated 20,802 US troops for injuries received in Iraq. According to the Pentagon’s figures, 54% of the wounded are too seriously injured to return to their units. If that figure is correct, it would mean that the insurgents have put 11,233 US troops out of action. Add in the 1,254 US troops who have been killed for a total of 12,487. That’s 9% of our total force in Iraq and a much higher percentage of our combat force.

There is no indication that we have put 12,487 Iraqi insurgents out of action. Indeed, until very recently the US military estimated that there were only several thousand active insurgents in all of Iraq.

---

For all our firepower, we are not winning the war. Fallujah has been destroyed, but the US military can claim only 1200–1600 insurgents were killed. Many of the dead counted as insurgents are probably civilians killed by the US military’s indiscriminate use of high explosives. But even if we assume the military’s estimate of enemy dead is accurate, it is an unimpressive figure in view of the 850 wounded and 71 dead Americans. US Fallujah casualties of 921 is a strikingly high figure considering the heavy armor, artillery, helicopter gunships, jet fighters, and sophisticated communications that back up US troops.

LewRockwell.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. We are getting judo flipped every day
Edited on Mon Dec-06-04 08:41 PM by teryang
...what about the tens of billions in resources wasted there? The casualties are bad enough, but the operation is not fiscally sustainable either. The entire political agenda of our nation is being dictated to by the requirements of a military campaign that is doomed to failure. The number of Iraqi's who's lives, families and business endeavors have been destroyed aren't even measured. The truth is that we have created millions of new enemies and have alienated the entire Islamic world.

Er, mission accomplished?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
googly Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. The current Iraq war is a typical urban guerilla warfare....however
compared to previous urban guerilla warfare history, we are doing better by orders of magnitude in terms of speed of victories and ratio of enemy killed to our casualties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Let's do body counts, oh I forgot...
...we don't do body counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. What's that ratio?
If we're talking orders of magnitude - it must be 10 to 1.

So we've killed nearly 12,000 insurgents then.

Really - what's the ratio?

Let's hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
googly Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. I think in hand to hand, house to house, urban combat,
the military expects almost even number of casualties on both sides, which is why this is the most dreaded form of combat. I don't have exact stats but in the recent Falluja offensive, we killed aprox 1200 vs our killed are less than 100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. "typical urban guerilla warfare"
Edited on Mon Dec-06-04 09:39 PM by bemildred
Would the acronym be "TUGW" maybe?

We are getting our ass handed to us on a plate, in terms of
guerilla conflict, as was predicted before this fuckwit display
started, and the political "leadership", and I use that term
loosely, does not give a shit because their primary agenda is
domestic politics, i.e. remaining in power a bit longer and
running the country into bankruptcy, or as near to that as can
be managed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Ready for something ugly?
Go do a study of 'reserve currency' in relationship to our national debt and who holds a bunch of it and a VERY scary picture will emerge.

Especially since what emerges from that picture is... this administration thinks they are going to SAVE us. (from ourselves)

Essentially by getting into an illegal invasion rather than playing on a level field... pretty typical of these Neo-cons... oh yeah - and they SUCK at 'saving us'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yep, I know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemocratInSC Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Libertarians share every person's desire for a free lunch
Enough said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Try to be coherent.
What are you trying to say?
Libertarians are Socialists, or welfare queens, or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemocratInSC Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Try this link
Edited on Mon Dec-06-04 10:54 PM by LastDemocratInSC
I don't endorse EVERY point made here, but I think it is, in the main, a good representation of how I feel libertarianism.

I would, for example, get rid of the "stupid" label and replace it with "ignorant" (that is a lame attempt to make you feel better).

http://www.amadan.org/blog/archives/000077.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. OK, I agree.
Some of their "thinking" is shallow, narrow-gauge stuff, and
the Ayn Rand worship makes me want to puke, and I think governments
can be versatile and useful myself, politics doesn't have to be
a zero-sum game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC