Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

soldiers deserve a better defense secretary :William Kristol

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:26 AM
Original message
soldiers deserve a better defense secretary :William Kristol
The Defense Secretary We Have
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A132-2004Dec14.html
By William Kristol
Wednesday, December 15, 2004; Page A33


Actually, we have a pretty terrific Army. It's performed a lot better in this war than the secretary of defense has. President Bush has nonetheless decided to stick for now with the defense secretary we have, perhaps because he doesn't want to make a change until after the Jan. 30 Iraqi elections. But surely Don Rumsfeld is not the defense secretary Bush should want to have for the remainder of his second term.

Contrast the magnificent performance of our soldiers with the arrogant buck-passing of Rumsfeld. Begin with the rest of his answer to Spec. Thomas Wilson of the Tennessee Army National Guard:

"Since the Iraq conflict began, the Army has been pressing ahead to produce the armor necessary at a rate that they believe -- it's a greatly expanded rate from what existed previously, but a rate that they believe is the rate that is all that can be accomplished at this moment. I can assure you that General Schoomaker and the leadership in the Army and certainly General Whitcomb are sensitive to the fact that not every vehicle has the degree of armor that would be desirable for it to have, but that they're working at it at a good clip."

Leave aside the fact that the issue is not "the number of troops we had for the invasion" but rather the number of troops we have had for postwar stabilization. Leave aside the fact that Gen. Tommy Franks had projected that he would need a quarter-million troops on the ground for that task -- and that his civilian superiors had mistakenly promised him that tens of thousands of international troops would be available. Leave aside the fact that Rumsfeld has only grudgingly and belatedly been willing to adjust even a little bit to realities on the ground since April 2003. And leave aside the fact that if our generals have been under pressure not to request more troops in Iraq for fear of stretching the military too thin, this is a consequence of Rumsfeld's refusal to increase the size of the military after Sept. 11.

These soldiers deserve a better defense secretary than the one we have.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dear William Kristol:
Why do I not believe a word you say? Just because you and your dear "former best friend" have had a falling out?

The war in Iraq was YOUR baby, just as much as it was Bush's, Cheney's, Wolfowitz', and many others. Because the war is going badly, however, you are looking very hard for a scapegoat. I admit, Rumsfeld is a pretty easy target. He's everyone's idea of a complete bone-head. He's silly, ridiculous, and to boot he believes he's a "Renaissance Man"; he can write eloquent poetry while killing people, all at the same time.

He's a convenient target. However, this has nothing to do with your plans.

I'm certainly glad you got stuck with such a fool. Too bad about the rest of us.

Sincerely, Cliss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Lil' Billy Kristol!
You mischevious scamp! You lil' imp!

Gosh, who beat the war drums and flogged the plan for global empire? Who used his towering intellect to pimp this war and this president and this Defense Secretary and his rat-bitten scabby "doctrine"?

Not Me, that's who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm Having A Hard TIme Trying To Guess
just who would be a better Sec. of Defense, in Bill Kristol's (and the NeoCon's) eyes.

And frankly, this fish rotted from the head down, so unless and until the Commander in Chief is replaced, don't expect any improvements in the Cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Little Willie is having the willies over the war, it seems. Who appointed
Rumsfield, Willie? Well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rummy is providing a valuable service
all the discredited hawks can scramble to appear reasonable by using him as a convenient target.

Kristol, McCain, Schwarzkopf and all the other faux Rummy critics are just as much part of the problem as Rummy is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Awwww, poor little Billy.
Rummy woke him from his psychopathic wet dream of World Domination and now he's pouting.

Kristol and the rest of the neo-cons are war criminals who are trying to cover-up their sick, sick, sick New World Order by using Rummy as the fall guy.

P U K E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. The soldiers (and us) need a better...
president too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC