Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"jettisoning some environmental protections" that have been around 20 year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 06:33 AM
Original message
"jettisoning some environmental protections" that have been around 20 year
Great--the enviromental issues are hitting the front pages!!
Just like BushCo to release this story just before Christmas when people have other things on their minds.


http://slate.msn.com/id/2111412/


The Los Angeles Times, NYT, and WP all front the new from the administration rules making it easier for forest service officials to approve logging and drilling. The Post calls it the "biggest change in forest-use policies in nearly three decades" and says it includes "jettisoning some environmental protections" that have been around 20 years. The revisions, which will cut lots of paperwork, also allow economic development issues to get equal weight as environmental concerns. The LAT does a bit of digging, and notices that three of President Bush's "elite fund-raisers" were timber execs.




And this is from an earlier posting on this board:

Administration Overhauls Rules for U.S. Forests

By FELICITY BARRINGER

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/23/politics/23forest.htm...

Published: December 23, 2004

WASHINGTON, Dec. 22 -The Bush administration issued broad new rules Wednesday overhauling the guidelines for managing the nation's 155 national forests and making it easier for regional forest managers to decide whether to allow logging, drilling or off-road vehicles.

The long-awaited rules relax longstanding provisions on environmental reviews and the protection of wildlife on 191 million acres of national forest and grasslands. They also cut back on requirements for public participation in forest planning decisions.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. shock and awe!
not so much.
i guess that i'm amused that these newspapers are even spending time reporting this.
bushco is exactly that -- bushco.
but maybe i've become cynical -- ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. My. The environment makes the front page 2 days before Christmas
Way to go, fourth estate! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. And some economic protections that have been around some 30-60+ years
are being readied for jettisoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC