Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brave New World’s top stories of 2005&Top 5 stories lost in the shuffl

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 11:46 AM
Original message
Brave New World’s top stories of 2005&Top 5 stories lost in the shuffl
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6762173/
Brave New World’s top stories of 2005

<snip>The Top 5 stories lost in the shuffle:

Ebb tide for democracy: With the United States spending political capital in Iraq like a shopaholic at the Mall of America, victories we thought we had won in recent years are slipping away. Democracy and free speech are in retreat in Africa and in Central Asia (with the exception of Afghanistan, where an undermanned, under-funded international force struggles to help Hamid Karzai exercise his democratically elected authority). Pakistan’s democracy remains in receivership. China and Iran, which tolerated a bit of dissent in recent years, are booking the dissenters back into their jail cells. In other places — Nepal, Bolivia, Haiti, The Philippines, to name a few — political murder and intimidation have increased in the vacuum caused by America’s neglect. The news is worst from Russia, which is reverting to full-fledged despotism under Vladimir Putin, thanks to an awfully long leash from war-on-terror ally George W. Bush. More on this in next item.

Russia’s reversion to type: After an almost dream-like decade and a half of toying with the idea of joining the Western democracies, Russia moved decisively into the past this year. Vladimir Putin stomped out most of what remained of the free media that blossomed after the Soviet Union fell; he jailed tycoons who dared to back opposition parties; he flexed his muscles with former Soviet states (successfully in Central Asia and Belarus, unsuccessfully in Ukraine). Most seriously, he announced that Russia was developing a new generation of ICBMs that would defeat the missile shield Washington continues to pour money into (in spite of its abject failure so far). Does George Bush still see into Putin’s soul?

The rift remains: In spite of the new mandate the Bush administration has won, American allies will remain deeply suspicious of U.S. intentions abroad. The ideological rift that opened as an invasion of Iraq was debated in 2003 is not closing; at the same time, the percentage of America’s national debt being underwritten by European, Canadian and Asian countries is skyrocketing. The president needs to take serious steps to fix this or face the prospect of a world that has de facto control over the U.S. monetary system and the rules of international trade.

Military backlash: The United States military is now stretched to its limit by foreign deployments — especially in Iraq — with some units facing the prospect next year of a THIRD tour of duty in the meat grinder. Reforms of the Reserve and National Guard system lag badly behind the need, and the Pentagon continues to resist the expensive but necessary step of increasing the size of the active-duty force. These strains, plus years of building the wrong weapons and training troops for the wrong kind of combat, will begin to cause serious recruitment, retention and morale problems in 2005.

Displacement: The inevitable reordering of Asia’s geopolitical realities may be happening in the shadows as Washington focuses like a laser beam on the backwaters of the Middle East, but happening it is. Asian states recently decided to ask China to join them in a regional cooperation group that does not include the United States. Japan just rescinded post-war limitations on military involvement overseas (and arms sales abroad). India and China, together, are quickly assuming control of electronics and software manufacturing, adding to economies already playing the "workshop of the world" role that America filled at the turn of the 20th century. Only militarily is the United States predominant in Asia, and history shows the military balance is usually the last but also the quickest to change. How should Washington should react to all this? With restraint. The current non-reaction, though, borders on neglect.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6762173/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC