Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Editorial: The stingy U.S. An appalling performance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Indie Media Magazine Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 12:42 AM
Original message
Editorial: The stingy U.S. An appalling performance
"The United States is not stingy," Secretary of State Colin Powell bristled in response to criticism of a paltry $15 million initial U.S. contribution to tsunami-relief efforts. Bulletin for Powell: That's not the way many Americans and most the rest of the world see it.

As the Bush administration is wont to say, actions speak louder than words, and America's actions in recent days have painted the United States as a rich, self-absorbed and uncaring nation that had to be shamed into anything approaching appropriate concern about this catastrophe. The Bush administration's handling of this crisis has been inept beyond belief.

Editorial: The stingy U.S. An appalling performance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Inept Beyond Belief"
it is good to know that there are some constants in this ever-changing world...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Many kudos for emphasizing this constant that is oblivious to a citizenry
almost wholly inept in performance of even the most basic duties of citizenship and patriotism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Link Not Working
for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. by contrast the Australia PM
(whether you like him or not) has been very visible from the beginning. Releasing $10mil cash and military equipment/personnel for immediate assistance, and upping the offer for more funds later when the magnitude began to be realized. I thought it was odd though today at a press conference someone asked him about Bush and the American contribution - he sort of side stepped a direct answer and abruptly ended the questions.
I wonder what he's privately thinking of Bushie's inaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetLeftFoot Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Howard
While I despise the little turd I do think he has behaved well here.
That said, if the quake was 100 k south, Darwin would have been wiped out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush is inept... so what's new?
Edited on Thu Dec-30-04 07:31 AM by ixion
Why are people consistently surprised when they discover that BushCo is an inept group of mafia thugs?

They have been consistent in their reaction to events like this (save, of course, for their trifecta of 911)

No great surprise here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puddycat Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. on C-span a Bushie was indiginant at the thought of contributing anything
yesterday, as I recall--this freeper-type said he paid enough taxes. These people have no sense of responsibility to fellow humans. I'm poor as a church-mouse and I've already sent as much as I can afford (which sadly isn't a lot right now).

What is wrong with the right? what makes them so shamefully self-centered and selfish? I do believe most of them are at the heart good people, but they've seem to have lost a large part of their soul in their constant drive to achieve class and wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It is called social Darwinism..If you can't make it on your own...too bad.
They will step right over you as you lay dying in the street. In their view, being rich is a sign of "righteousness"..Puritanism at its best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puddycat Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. good point. I've seen it even in the servants of the rich
I personally know two women who genuinely believe that the wealth of their employers is prima facie evidence of their better character and that they must be more deserving. I just don't understand that kind of thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indie Media Magazine Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. minor correction....."Shameful" = Shameless! nt ; )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm surprised Bush hasn't offered billions; he will NEVER send it
anyway. Did Africa get money from the "bring 'em on" photo op?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. President Bush’s “Appropriate” Response
by Walter Brasch
www.dissidentvoice.org
December 30, 2004

Another good response:

<snip>

By then, Canada, with a population of about 11 percent that of the U.S. and a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) about 6 percent that of the U.S., pledged $33 million. Spain, with a population of about one-seventh that of the U.S. and a GDP about 6 percent that of the U.S., quickly pledged more than $68 million in relief, twice that initially committed by the U.S. Australia, with a population about 7 percent and a GDP about 4 percent of that of the United States, pledged $20 million. Japan, with a population about two-fifths and a GDP about half that of the U.S., pledged at least $40 million; the United Kingdom, with a population of one-fifth and a GDP of about 13 percent of that of the U.S. also pledged at least $40 million. France, with a population about one-fifth that of the U.S. and a GDP about one-tenth that of the U.S., quickly pledged $27 million. Also responding quickly, with statements by their leaders coupled with financial and humanitarian assistance, were dozens of other countries. Israel contributed millions and pledged a 150-member medical team; other countries had already been shipping thousands of tons of relief supplies. International aid organizations believe more than $14 billion will be needed for humanitarian assistance, much of it donated by individuals and corporations.

On Wednesday, the third day after the earthquake and resulting tsunami, with the death toll approaching 70,000, and expected to rise to more than 100,000, with more than two million expected to be homeless, with substantial health and sanitation problems for those who lived, and with millions now questioning why America’s president hadn’t spoken out or committed more resources, George W. Bush finally held a news conference on his ranch.

“Laura and I, and the American people, are shocked and we are saddened,” said the President at the beginning of a 327-word statement that took only about three minutes to deliver. He said that earlier that morning he spoke with the leaders of India, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Indonesia, four of the countries hit hardest by the disaster. He then announced American disaster experts were in the affected areas, that he had ordered an aircraft carrier group to divert to the Indian Ocean, a hospital ship, seven water-producing ships, a Marine expeditionary unit and several aircraft to assist relief operations.


<snip>

The previous year, the U.S. Agency for International Development provided about $2.4 billion for humanitarian relief, much of it for work in Afghanistan and Iraq, the largest contribution of any country in the world. President Bush believes the United States might provide as much as $ 1 billion in cash and in-kind donations (the cost of maintaining the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln in the Indian Ocean is figured into the totals) to assist the nations hit by the worst natural disaster in more than four decades. That $1 billion, if all of it is sent to the affected nations, would be about one-half of one percent of what is planned for the war in Iraq. It was what the President decided would be “appropriate.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC