Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Model Emergency Health Powers Acts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:43 PM
Original message
Model Emergency Health Powers Acts?
The “model” is a generic statute, intended to be enacted by the individual states. As “suggested,” the individual state health personnel could ultimately wind up under the control of the federal government; expected to act as a police force. Their ‘emergency powers’ would be Gestapo in nature, including the power to arrest people who refuse to take prescribed “immunizations,” or carting them off to “Quarantine Camps.”

Anyone ever heard of this? Have these acts been passed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. If those Raygun-era Ollie North written "laws" ever come into use
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 03:46 PM by tom_paine
Then grease your {THIS POTION REDACTED BY ORDER OF HOMELAND SECURITY} and get ready to {THIS POTION REDACTED BY ORDER OF HOMELAND SECURITY}.

Because it will be too late by that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. They sneaked it in under the radar
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 04:17 PM by Monica_L
The feds tried bribing and threatening the states with economic repercussions if they didn't pass it "as is." Some states flat out refused to pass it and others watered it down. Then they just put it into the HOmeland Security Bill at the last minute. It's one piece of scary legislation.

It gives HHS secretary unchecked powers and leaves citizens without legal remedy for harm suffered by untested vaccines.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/02/11/20_homeland.html

One hastily added amendment to the Homeland Security bill, for example, which was rumored to have been added at the White House's request, is the provision under which pharmaceutical companies would be protected from lawsuits. Currently, 150 lawsuits have been filed against vaccine manufacturers, alleging that mercury preservatives within measles, mumps and rubella vaccines caused their children's autism (the New York Times recently dubbed this "the not-so-crackpot autism theory"). This amendment, which has nothing to do with Homeland Security, would limit compensation to $250,000. Paul Wellstone's amendment which would prevent companies who avoid paying US taxes by moving offshore from contracting with the Homeland Security Department was removed.

Even more sinister, however, is that new provisions reintroduce proposals which were previously rejected by most states in last years' Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MEHPA). Calling for mandatory vaccination, MEHPA allows for confiscation of real estate, food, medicine and other property; and outlines plans to herd afflicted citizens into stadiums. Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson urged state legislatures to adopt the act, providing all the proof conspiracy theorists needed to prove that the U.S government was using 9/11 to impose a reign of tyranny. The mysterious deaths of 15 microbiologists following the attacks didn't help.

Yet according to the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, under this Homeland Security provision, MEHPA would be all but reborn under section 304, subsection C of the bill. Tommy Thompson would be given sweeping powers to unilaterally declare an emergency and order forced vaccinations, detainment and quarantines. Bemoaning that the provision was "snuck into the bill at the last minute," Rep. Ron Paul (R, TX) said, "It is hard to think of a more blatant violation of liberty than allowing government officials to force people to receive potentially dangerous vaccines based on hypothetical risks."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC