Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Puts Giant Sequoias on the chopping block

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 09:59 AM
Original message
Bush Puts Giant Sequoias on the chopping block
www.BushGreenwatch.org

www.bushgreenwatch.org/mt_archives/000064.php
3-2-4

Under the guise of forest fire prevention, the Bush Administration's Forest Service has proposed logging in California's Sequoia National Monument, home to some of the world's tallest and oldest trees, reaching ages of 3,200 years or more.<1> Also at risk are the Pacific fisher, the California spotted owl, and many other threatened species dependent on ancient forest habitat.<2>

Established by President Clinton in 2000, the Monument designation was the culmination of years of work by environmentalists. But in its draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for management of the Monument, the Forest Service chose the most environmentally destructive of six alternative management plans, the one calling for the most intensive logging.

Under the Forest Service's "preferred alternative," 80,000 acres would be opened for logging, including trees up to 30 inches in diameter, a size not permitted in most National Forests throughout the Sierra Nevada.<3> The Forest Service's proposal calls for 180 clearcuts, producing 10 million board feet a year.<4>

The Forest Service plan is based on the idea that if the ancient Sequoias aren't logged, they will be vulnerable to catastrophic fires (despite the fact that they have somehow managed to survive for thousands of years on their own). But the real motivation may lie in a sentence buried deep in the EIS, which says logging in the Monument "might make the difference between continued operation and closure of the one mill available to serve the Monument."

If fire prevention is actually the Forest Service's agenda, experts cite better ways to accomplish this, such as thinning the forest near homes and businesses, and increasing the number of prescribed burns.

Logging in the Monument will actually increase the likelihood of severe fires, since removal of the large trees reduces the cooling shade of the forest canopy, and because highly flammable brush accumulates in open areas where logged trees once stood.<5>

In a final insult, the Forest Service plan will actually be subsidized by taxpayers, to the tune of $34 million. Much of that will go toward road building, even though there are already 900 miles of roads in the Monument. And nearly $14 million of taxpayer money will be spent for "mechanical thinning of conifer" -- otherwise known as logging.
<6>

SOURCES:

<1> Presidential Proclamation establishing Sequoia National Monument, April 15, 2000.

<2> "Forest Service Bushwhacks Giant Sequoia National Monument," Sierra Club.
http://www.sierraclub.org/ca/sequoia/monument/fs_bushwacks_gsnm.html

<3> "Forest Service Proposes to Log Sequoia National Monument," The Wilderness Society.
http://www.wilderness.org/WhereWeWork/California/sequoiamonument- logging.cfm

<4> Ibid.

<5> Action Alert, Sequoia ForestKeeper.
http://www.sequoiaforestkeeper.org/currentprojects.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asinton Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sequoias need fire to propagate

Giant Sequois drop their seeds after a fire, which clears the ground for their saplings. It probably ajdusts the ph as well. They have thick bark to withstand forest fires. There are scars to show their survival of previous fires.

I find it hard to believe that anyone familiar with forestry doesn't know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bushco is not familiar with
forestry. They are greed driven...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. They know. They just don't give a damn. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Can't argue with bush on this one
Cutting down all the trees WILL prevent forest fires. There's a parking lot in my city that hasn't had a single forest fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Very good point - A lot of villages in Vietnam were saved from the Commies
in much the same way. Might have some possibilities for the endangered species as well - if we shoot them we won't have to spend money protecting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is he trying to rally our base?
Can't do a better job than he's been doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Shrub is a "uniter", remember?
I do believe the Democrats are united. Good job, shrub!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Those monuments belong to every American
Not some %#@&*^! mill! Talk about private interests over people!(And no, this isn't about "protecting jobs". If * cared about that he wouldn't ship them all overseas)! Humanity is hardwired for nature; we need to immerse ourselves in little unspoiled pockets of it from time to time. Our survival in more ways than one depends on it's preservation.

One thing I've always wondered about;how can people who claim to revere God have such complete contempt for His creation? The Bible commands Stewardship of the earth, not it's destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. stunning
180 clearcuts..
GW and his merry band of Orcs seem to enjoy the rape and pillage of our mother.
There are not words to describe these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder myself
The 30 inch rule pretty much only cuts small trees, and thins the
forest.

I've hiked around the canyons away from the great redwoods years back, and i remember noticing how fire could catch in those hot
dry canyons and be virtually unstoppable. Then people get involved
and want to stop "NATURAL" fires... and they stop them too long only
creating a massive explosive fire when it finally goes.

Given they've already messed up by blocking the fires, it might
make sense to selectively cut to prevent a fire taking out the redwoods. That the seeds need fire to open must be considered
that a too-hot fire will burn the redwoods down anyways. The thick
bark "helps" but does not render those huge redwoods fireproof.

I just hope that if they are cutting, that giant "redwoods" of
any size are not cut.

.. just that does not jive with the word "clearcut"... unless the
cuts are to create wide firebreaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hammie Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. 30 inches?
For a Sequoia, that is a sapling. It seem highly unlikely that "Ancient" Sequoia will be found among the population of trees that is 30 inches and smaller.

Anyway, you can read the text of the proposal here http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/sequoia/gsnm/feis/chap2/chap2.pdf

Highlights:

Amount of road to remain essentially unchanged, with existing roads that exhibit adverse environmental impact to be repaired, moved, or closed.

Gaps in forest created by mechanical thinning (logging) to be less than 2 acres with a target of less than 1 acre and a total area of less than 5%.


It hardly reads like a plan to raze the Ancient Sequoia to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. G_j
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
news source.


Thank you

DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC