Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The choice of Cheney was never in the long term interest of the GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 03:41 PM
Original message
The choice of Cheney was never in the long term interest of the GOP
Edited on Sat Mar-13-04 03:45 PM by wuushew
In the twentieth century the Vice-Presidency has been considered a leap stone to the Presidency. Hoover followed Coolidge, Nixon followed Ike and Bush 41 followed Raygun. Of course Gore should have followed Clinton as well. In most cases the Vice President has been younger than the man he serves. Kennedy broke this rule perhaps unwisely as LBJ died in 1973 of a bad heart.

Knowing that the long term demographics are against them did the GOP consciously decide to run a very conservative, very pro-business ticket knowing that they had to do the most damage possible in only 4-8 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. They had to run someone older and smarter...
That was a test of your gag reflex...

Without Cheney, I doubt that the Supremes would have selected the freak monkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nah, they knew Bush* was malleable enough to do their bidding
had the name recognition and family connections, but didn't care enough about anything except Nintendo to get in the way of Cheney and Co running the country (into the ground). Jeb was their followup. Only problem is that Cheney doesn't have enough plan to keep GWB in power for 8 years and should, by rights, have mucked up the Bush name enough for even the most ignorant GOP support to have tired of the whole family. When Bush* goes down in flames in 4 years, just like Daddy, Bush* is going to be the dictionary definition you turn to when you want to find out what Loser means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seems very possible.
They sure have done a lot in just the first three years. They came in with a plan and just went about executing it right away. Everything was in place for them. Think they would like another four to complete the job. Seems like they are more on a mission. Hopefully the Repukes in Congress are getting an earful at home and are afraid of losing their jobs. Getting the feeling that they would rather be in opposition to a Dem president so they wouldn't have to actually be responsible, right now they are left with all the blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NEOBuckeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. When George loses this fall, Jeb is most likely out of the picture for '08
That's not 100% certain, though the Florida Dems can (and likely will) destroy his chances by running a successful candidate to beat him in the 2006 Florida Governor's race. Jeb needs that upcoming validation as Governor to boost himself to a Presidential race. If he loses, then the GOP leadership will likely see him as too weak to run.

And even if he does win, it's entirely possible that the Republican party leadership in general is beginning to really tire of the Bush family. In hindsight, they probably would've preferred John McCain as President, who would have at least maintained a more stable moderate course, and would be in a good position now to get reelected. Memories of Bush will likely remain with the population for quite some time to come, and they won't be fond ones. Once he's out of office, I think people will be hard-pressed to find anything remotely good about his reign. That won't help Jeb at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. JEB could avoid that by not running for a 3rd term.
Provided he has proven that he was good governor. But of course, his brother never proved he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Remember Cheney picked HIMSELF
Bush had asked Cheney to submit names of people he thought would be good VPs and Cheney's selection committee pick Duh Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Cheney was a vast improvement over
Dan Quayle, Bush I's VP.

Picking miserable VPs seems to be a trend here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Jack Kemp seemed a decent choice for Dole in 96
I can't explain Quayle, truly one of the worst vp picks in political history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You know for 24 hours
Dole/Kemp almost seemed like a "not bad" Republican ticket. For all his conservative supply-side economics, I had a feeling Kemp almost really wanted ordinary people to do better.

Until Kemp started caving into the "know nothings"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just a familiar name to help ...
Numb Nuts.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is not a normal administration.
This is a cabal of PNAC'ers of which Cheney is a high standing member. The way they got into power is without a doubt a coup. The normal way of doing business doesn't interest them. I am really concerned that if they are going to play the game in November, pretending to still follow a democratic election procedure and if the charade doesn't go well for them, what might they try to pull?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC