Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Memo To Condi: "You Cannot Prove A Negative"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 10:19 AM
Original message
Memo To Condi: "You Cannot Prove A Negative"
"...for twelve years Saddam refused to account for his weapons of mass destruction......"

um Condi, how can one account for something one does not possess?

Condi?

CONDI????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. She will answer...
when he head stops spinning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Condi=sock puppet for the administration
Maybe this woman has a great education, but she's shown absolutely no original thought of her own since taking office. I don't believe any exists. Anyone who's been to college knows that just because one obtains a degree, doesn't make one intelligent. There are tons of people who get by solely on the ability to kiss ass and regurgitate information. I'm likely to believe she was one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great!
I've been thinking about that too. Just how would you prove you don't have something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. What part of "destroyed after the first gulf war" do these people NOT get?
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Where did the orginal inventory number come from?
Us? We started the whole program.

Saddam? Why would we believe him about that?

Did they start with a known known and work backwards? What makes it a known known and not a unknown known or a known unknown?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Exactly! Remember when St. Ronald of Reagan removed Iraq
from the "State-Sponsored Terrorist List"? That enabled military shipments to be made to Iraq. We sent them TONS of stuff, even after we knew they were using WMD against Iran and the Kurds. We also had the Italians do some dirty work for us by shipping Iraq arms as a "middle man".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. When did we send over the "Beware of Dog" sign?
That was back when he was OUR S.O.B. which is soooooooo last century.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. I can't believe a word she says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. See, this is why, in the United States, the burden of proof is on the
accuser (in theory, anyway).

If a cop arrests me for drug possession, the burden is on the state and the cop to prove I actually have drugs. I do not have any illegal substances in my house or vehicle (and normally don't, unless a visitor has some on his or her person). However, it's virtually impossible for me to prove that I don't. That's why it's up to the cops to find the evidence. No evidence, no conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oh that is the OLD America we are talking about the New America
or the plan for the New America this century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nothing would make me happier than....
seeing this administration put in leg irons and locked stepped off to prison. All of them, male and female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Can Condi prove that she is NOT lying?
Can she prove that there aren't NOT WMD over there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. LOL
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC