Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it true Richard Clarke blamed Bill Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:22 PM
Original message
Is it true Richard Clarke blamed Bill Clinton
last year from 9/11 failures? Or is this some freeper wet dream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I do not think so
He praised Clinton last night on 60 minutes for reacting to intelligence info and foiling the '99 bombing attempt on LAX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. No
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 12:33 PM by WoodrowFan
Basically I think he gave Clinton a C+ (or even higher?) for his handling of terrorism and Shrub gets a big fat hairy F-. Of course the freeprs only pay attention to Clinton's grade..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I read on Yahoo a poster giving excerpts from a David Miniter (sp?)
book that came out blaming Clinton for 9/11. It had quotes of Clarke blaming WJC for 9/11. I didn't know if you guys had heard about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:31 PM
Original message
It's spin.
He praised Clinton for some actions, and said he'd wished Bush admin had acted similarly, but also said that Clinton had rejected one of his ideas. I'm sure someone has better details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. No.
...
Clarke says the last time the CIA had picked up a similar level of chatter was in December, 1999, when Clarke was the terrorism czar in the Clinton White House.

Clarke says Mr. Clinton ordered his Cabinet to go to battle stations-- meaning, they went on high alert, holding meetings nearly every day.

That, Clarke says, helped thwart a major attack on Los Angeles International Airport, when an al Qaeda operative was stopped at the border with Canada, driving a car full of explosives.

Clarke harshly criticizes President Bush for not going to battle stations when the CIA warned him of a comparable threat in the months before Sept. 11: "He never thought it was important enough for him to hold a meeting on the subject, or for him to order his National Security Adviser to hold a Cabinet-level meeting on the subject."
...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/19/60minutes/main607356.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, it was more like
disappointment that Clinton didn't immediately want to go into Afghanistan. Clinton said the other day it was because he didn't want to hand the incoming adminstration a hot war like he had been handed Somalia.

Clarke did praise Clinton for the daily terrorist breifings. The exchange of information clearly helped foil the plot at LAX. Remember when all we thought about it was how bizarre it all seemed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. The opposite is true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. I heard a snippet of the interview today where
he said something like "There's a lot of blame to go around including myself..." Which is probably true.

I think it says a lot, though, that Clinton and Gore and other people from their administration are willing to talk to the 9-11 investigators and Bush and Cheney had to have their teeth pulled to give one measly little hour to the head of the commission, but won't talk to the panel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim4319 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. He gave props to Bill Clinton!
He was saying how Bill Clinton had "shake the tree" meetings every morning. Each branch, with intelligence links, had to give an update on the status of Al Qaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC