Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The following was in today's American Progress:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:20 AM
Original message
The following was in today's American Progress:
9/11
Bush Admits Negligence

President Bush yesterday once again tried to fend off charges of gross negligence before 9/11, saying, "Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to strike America, to attack us, I would have used every resource, every asset, every power of this government to protect the American people." But with more evidence emerging this week that the White House received repeated warnings before 9/11 of an imminent Al Qaeda attack, the President's "had I known" defense raises two disturbing scenarios: Either a) the Administration is telling the truth, actually did not know of the threat despite receiving repeated warnings and was totally oblivious to a brewing national security crisis. Or b) the Administration is not telling the truth, actually knew about the threat from the warnings it received, and yet still failed to act with adequate urgency. See a list of warnings the Administration received before 9/11 and what they failed to do in response. Also see these internal government documents showing how the Administration downgraded and tried to slash funding for counterterrorism before 9/11.


http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=39856

There are links to the various articles/sites.

Enjoy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. um . . . they were doing a simulation of a plane attack on buildings . . .
on the morning of 9/11! . . . and Cheney attended . . . so how could they claim they had no idea that planes might be used in an attack? . . .

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=22437
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmm, the "Not guilty by virtue of incompetence" defense.
Oh my! "Don't blame me, I'm a useless piece of trash."

Yep, that's the question. A monster or an imbecile. Or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It looks like they wanted some kind of an attack to happen.....
not realizing, of course, the immense magnitude of the 2 towers going down and its consequences.

They knew but they didn't THINK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Just a second while I adjust my...
:tinfoilhat:.

It has crossed my mind, that the first thing that they thought of, was the bomber crashing into the Empire State Building. There was damage of course, but the building didn't collapse. Of course there were two different buiding styles, but the thought goes through my mind, that they never thaought the buildings would actually collapse.

In any case, they seem to have had quite a bit of knowledge of events long before the actuall attacks. As to whether they used any of this knowledge constructively... I don't think they did in any sense of situation that was presented.

:( :hi: Opi!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC