Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman on character assassination and abuse of power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 01:31 AM
Original message
Krugman on character assassination and abuse of power
OP-ED COLUMNIST
This Isn't America
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Published: March 30, 2004


....the administration responded to Mr. Clarke the way it responds to anyone who reveals inconvenient facts: with a campaign of character assassination.

Some journalists seem, finally, to have caught on. Last week an Associated Press news analysis noted that such personal attacks were "standard operating procedure" for this administration and cited "a behind-the-scenes campaign to discredit Richard Foster," the Medicare actuary who revealed how the administration had deceived Congress about the cost of its prescription drug bill.

But other journalists apparently remain ready to be used. On CNN, Wolf Blitzer told his viewers that unnamed officials were saying that Mr. Clarke "wants to make a few bucks, and that his own personal life, they're also suggesting that there are some weird aspects in his life as well."

This administration's reliance on smear tactics is unprecedented in modern U.S. politics — even compared with Nixon's. Even more disturbing is its readiness to abuse power — to use its control of the government to intimidate potential critics....

***

Where will it end? In his new book, "Worse Than Watergate," John Dean, of Watergate fame, says, "I've been watching all the elements fall into place for two possible political catastrophes, one that will take the air out of the Bush-Cheney balloon and the other, far more disquieting, that will take the air out of democracy."


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/30/opinion/30KRUG.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. And Krugman is right as well as Dean
I suspect in the end we will be able to win, but just barely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Krugman highlights a crucial fact about exactly HOW the Iraq adventure...
... hurt counterterrorism after 9-11:

'... new evidence keeps emerging for Mr. Clarke's main charge, that the Iraq obsession undermined the pursuit of Al Qaeda. From yesterday's USA Today: "In 2002, troops from the Fifth Special Forces Group who specialize in the Middle East were pulled out of the hunt for Osama bin Laden to prepare for their next assignment: Iraq. Their replacements were troops with expertise in Spanish cultures."'

If memory serves me correctly, David Kay said recently that there were only about 100 fluent Arabic speakers in the entire US intelligence community. However many were looking for non-existent WMDs in Iraq were unavailable for trying to track and infiltrate al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Thanks for this link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. President Kerry should award Krugman the Medal of Freedom
The award has such a fitting title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. "take the air out of democracy"
I’m already suffocating from the * administration’s bullshit. The air must be tight as well for Republicans that still have a real moral center. Those are the ones that you can quibble with about policy and still break bread without the possibility or even the notion of a total character assassination in response to an opposing viewpoint.

Unfortunately, no, alarmingly this is no longer the case. The * administration’s thug tactics as a response to legitimate concerns should be contested rather than sanctioned and blessed by the media. Oh, but that’s a democracy. No wonder the air is so tight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainoverload Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. all but blatant about their abuse of facts.
From an MSNBC story about release of Clarke's previous testimony.

"U.S. officials told NBC News that the full record of Clarke’s testimony two years ago would not be declassified. They said that at the request of the White House, however, the CIA was going through the transcript to see what could be declassified, with an eye toward pointing out contradictions."

So it's on the record that bushco. wants the CIA to release portions of Clarke's testimony that supports their side but that the rest of the testimony is to be withheld.

How many media outlets do you think are going to report this when the totally one-sided "transcript" gets released?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. This is a big problem
It is not going to help Clarkes story if they selectively release shit. These people are very shrewd...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. it's becoming The Usual Treatment....

"A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep." Saul Bellow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. (duplicate post)
Edited on Tue Mar-30-04 04:26 AM by Lexingtonian
(deleted)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. The hypocritical pundits are all laughing about it and pretending
like it's normal. I saw Tweety and Fineman chuckling about it together last night and Fineman said, "All president's do it, Clinton did it to Monica Lewinsky." and he saids it so fondly. You just know if Clinton had tried to do anything one tenth as nasty as Bush has done to people, that their heads would have been spinning around and they would have been spewing about the abuse of power like they were possessed.

I decided last night to quit watching that trash again. I stopped during the Iraq war and then they started luring me back in. No more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. MUST READ !!! - Thanks For Posting This !!!
:bounce::kick::bounce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Krugman understands the danger here. When he was on C-SPAN...
Edited on Tue Mar-30-04 07:48 AM by JanMichael
..."BookNotes" a few months ago he seems genuinely tense, almost shakey.

I hadn't heard the Dean quote before today...It's what I've been trying to get through to my dad for the last year. He's a pretty far Left Dem but he could never imagine how "bad" these people really are. The last couple of conversation, one last night, has had him going as far out into conjectureland as I do.

Oh well. At least we know a few people who "get" the BFEE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. I like the last paragraph of the article. John Dean's comment
is very powerful in my opinion.

Paul Krugman is very good. A must read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. Admin sources saying "some weird aspects in his life" about Clarke?
Edited on Tue Mar-30-04 08:04 AM by JHB
What are they saying? That he's "a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarface2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. weird aspects??!!
like a propensity to tell the truth??!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Mr. Clarke is unmarried, and there are rumors...
in Freeperland that he is gay. I heard Wolf Blitzer make the "weird aspects" comment live on CNN, and thought it puzzling, and incredibly inappropriate. My guess now that the rumors are circulating is that WH sources were spreading these rumors to Wolf. I neither know, nor care, if Clarke is gay, but if this was the issue that Blitzer characterized on national television as "some weird aspects in his life," then that statement is reprehensible -- as is the White House's discussing any aspect of Clarke's personal life with the press in an attempt to discredit him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kicking this Krugman column that brought attention...
to Wolf Blitzer's on-air "weird aspects in his life" comment about Richard Clarke --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiegranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. krugman...
always knows how to get to the heart of the matter. just said that to keep this thread kicked! this is an important essay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC