Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. military recruiters' new pitch is aimed at the parents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 12:36 PM
Original message
U.S. military recruiters' new pitch is aimed at the parents

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/living/education/6474788.htm

-snip-

A new Pentagon recruiting ad campaign, featuring Jones and four other role models, aims to persuade more parents to see the military as a winning option for their children. Parents usually can make or break the deals that recruiters want their offspring to sign.

But according to a 2002 Pentagon survey, most parents today view military service as a last resort, far behind continuing school and finding a job. The exceptions tend to be parents like Jones' who have served in uniform themselves, and their numbers are shrinking in these days of a downsized, all-volunteer military.

-snip-

"The ongoing casualties we are suffering in Iraq will definitely have a negative effect on recruitment," Moskos said.

-snip-

The Defense Department would like to draw recruits from all segments of society so the burden of defending the country is borne equally by all.
-snip-
-------------------

I'm posting this as we are all wondering about the Draft; and I'm disgusted at the brainwashing of parents and wonder if the brainwashing is working, etc. etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bait and switch
A major reason for many to volunteer was the promise of on the job training which would be transferable to post-service employment, along with tuition assistance. If the privatization of the army support services is continued and further expanded, the only on-the-job training will be for operating battlefield equipment, and instead of the one out of ten soldiers actually on the battle field, ALL of them will be actively fighting. The percentage of soldiers killed, maimed and/or otherwise seriously wounded will be much higher (by a factor of 10) - so those able to take advantage of the tuition assistance will decrease greatly. Yes, it's win-win for the Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC