Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should prisoners get flat-screen tv's in their cells?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:44 PM
Original message
Should prisoners get flat-screen tv's in their cells?


http://cnn.usnews.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=CNN.com+-+Oregon+prisoners+get+flat-screen+TVs+-+May+3%2C+2004&expire=&urlID=10105812&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2004%2FUS%2FWest%2F05%2F03%2Fprison.tv.ap%2Findex.html&partnerID=2004

SALEM, Oregon (AP) -- Convicted felon Nicholas Krahmer kicks back on a bunk and enjoys one of the latest perks of prison life: A spanking new flat-screen TV that's still the envy of many viewers on the outside.

The tiny 7-inch set resembles flat-screen models installed in cars or on airplane seats. But it beats the alternative, he says -- a night in the recreation room with about 150 other inmates who are prone to brawls over what to watch and where to sit.

Oregon's in-cell television policy springs from years of frustration in finding incentives for good behavior among prisoners serving mandatory sentences.

Krahmer bought the $300 television with money he earned working in prison, where he is paid a few dollars a day for computer drafting. Inmates also must have clean discipline records to qualify for the flat-screens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does it come with maid service?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rangerfan Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wonder who pays for the cable or Dish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_real_38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, but make them pay for the cable...
.... and make it Time Warner, so that they can't afford it (like me).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about give him a book? n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ugh! I'm reading 1984 right now...
and I can only imagine if those "Teleview screens" have two way cameras in them, letting Big Brother know what people are up to. That book does a number on you!:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Well,when I first read in in 1983, coincidentally
I seem to recall feeling a sense of relief that I didn't live there and would never have to knuckle under to a Lying, Spying Totalitarian Big Brother.

Now Bunnypants* IS Big Brother. And 1984 is closer to being Amerikan Relaity than at any time in our entire lives, perhaps in American History.

Don't get scared. Get mad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. haha..me too!
tho i read it as a schoolkid, i'm at pg 200 now...they do have tv's in jail! lol (the tv's yell 'shuttup! to prisoners, must have forseen O'reilly!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #32
57. LOL! I'm not that far yet, so don't tell me any more!
Every time I hear about Oh'Really's "Shut up!" comments, I picture The Daily Show's Stephen Colbert pushing his own (fictitious) show. There's a silent scene where, he's hysterically screaming "SHUT UP!" over and over again, in an obvious homage to Oh'Really. Then he pushes his book..."Don't buy this book if you don't have the BALLS!" LOL! I wish he did have his own show!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dr.strangelove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is a VERY GOOD program
The prisoners who buy these sets use their own money. The sets vastly reduce the number of prisoners going to the central TV viewing room/lounge, where prisoners have to take turns daily for TV control. There have been known to be outbrakes of violence over TV choice. This allows prisoners to remain in the cell and have a visitor over, to watch TV. 50 sets means up to 100 less people in the TV room.

It is a HUGE incentive to participate "Good Behavior" programs. Persons coming out of good behavious programs can get intop groups like "Better People," an Oregon NPO that helps prisoners transition into jobs after release that have solid pay and health benefits. (Go check out www.betterpeople.org GREAT organization!!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. They pay for it with their own money, why NOT?????
Hell it's a whopping 7 inches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Which law-abiding citizen
lost their drafting job to a prisoner who's paid a few dollars per day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sure ... as long as it can be ...
taken away for bad behaviour.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. If they earn it? Of course!

Or maybe not. On second thought we don't want to reward prisoners for good behaviour and hard work. When they get out of jail they will find that nobody hires an ex-con, and they will be forced into a life of crime. They should be learning skills from their fellow prisoners that they can employ on the outside instead of wasting their time learning how their life could have been before they screwed it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sure, Why Not?
Why not? I know some folks think that when a fellow or lady is jailed they should be subject to bamboo shoots under the fingernails but I don't see it that way. I do not demand inhuman treatment of prisoners and I don't demand that they better themselves. I only demand that they do the time the judge sentenced them to. If they can find a legal way to make that terrible time more tolerable who am I to say no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slksln Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. I think you misunderstand what a corrections facility is for.
A prison is meant for criminals to better themselves. Not to sit around until their "time is up." It is meant to be a place where a law-breaker can rehabilitate and become more suited to living in society.

Now, I agree with your point that if they can find a legal way to make their time better, more power to them. The prisons undersell contracts which other companies could have gotten for relatively unskilled labor (I do say relatively, since he does do computer drafting which can be taught on the job training or alternatively with an associates degree).

But just saying that they should serve the time the judge sentenced them to is going along with what prisons have been tending toward, rather than recognizing their ideal purpose. And the more we see them as a place to lock people up for a given amount of time, the less we will be outraged when that's all they are.

I hope I'm being coherent, it's been a loooong day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. LOL prisoner to "BETTER" themselves? Ever BEEN to a jail house?
Perps don't BETTER themselves, the gop and the privatized prison system have made sure that prison is indeed meant as punishment, and NOT so-called 'rehabilitation'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slksln Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
54. read my reply to the posts below (n/t)
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. I must disagree most forcefully
US prisons are not there to make people better - they exist to punish and exact a kind of revenge. If anyone becomes a "better" person once they leave the box (and step into the bigger box of society, but that is another post altogether), it is despite their surroundings, not because of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Exactly. These days prisons merely exist to create more prisoners and feed
the privatized prison machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slksln Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. now reread what I said...
Edited on Mon May-03-04 09:24 PM by slksln
And you will notice that I pointed out the difference between what they are tending toward and what they should be. If you had taken a minute to read the entire post (it wasn't THAT long) you'd have seen that I agree with you entirely.

HOWEVER, the more we all accept that they are tending further from what they should be, the more we will all collectively allow it to become worse.

edit: fixed grammar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. As long as it is used to control behavior...


It's really easy to look at this and think that this guy has it made, but he is still in prison.

Depending on his crime, and depending on his behavior he should be able to earn these privileges. It also helps to control violence among the inmates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Screw that. Prison needs to be a punishment, not a country club.
Let them read books and exercise, sure, but flat screen tv's? Fuck that. That guy could be in there for raping a 6 year old boy and he's kickin' back relaxing. Screw them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. What about it being a "Department of Corrections"?
Perhaps this helps enforce some good social values like
working hard and saving.

I understand the punishment part too but maybe this is a good
thing. It's only a 7 inch tv for christ's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
45. Or maybe he's in as a repeat offender
for his 3d pot conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. looks like that $3 a day
slave labor really pays off.

I wonder what the prospects of finding a job as a computer drafter in the nearby vincinity of that facility are? I bet there's slim pickins in that town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. A few dollars a day? We need to outsource that job.
Wow. Not only are Americans competing against cheap India white collar workers, and Chinese slave labor, now, we've got to compete against American jailbirds.

Frankly, I don't give a damn if every prisoner gets a flat screen tv as long as they pay for it. I give a lot bigger damn about US corporations using jailbirds as a cheap workforce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. shhhh
that is supposed to be a secret
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Bingo! Unemployed? Consider jail.
I give a lot bigger damn about US corporations using jailbirds as a cheap workforce.

This could be an incentive for more laws to jail more people! Patriot II?

Given that we already have our drug war classifying a lot of non-violent drug users as criminals, how much longer until "unemployment" is considered "criminal." The rationalization could be, "Hey, we've got a nice prison job for you here, and if you're really good, we might let you buy a TV with your disposable income."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Well, there is always 'treason'.
Then again, under Bush, they don't really need charges to jail you forever. Ask Jose Padilla. All they need to do is arrest you and lock you away. No lawyer. No charges. No trial. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Back we go
Here's an idea. Let's go back to "debtor's prison." Bad credit? Off you go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Serenity-NOW Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. ..paid a few dollars a day for computer drafting...
Lucky guy considering the economy. Working in IT, wowser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes they should for good reason
Any prison guard will tell you the best way to keep the peace in prisons is to treat people like humans not animals.

Many prisoners will be getting out one day and returning to public life. It is in society's best interests to make sure that while their freedom is taken away, their ability to benefit from good behavior is not and in fact actually AIDS them in living a good life once outside bars.

For the lifers involved, small perks are good to keep the peace behind bars since these people have nothing to lose by becoming violent.

Finally, the prisoner in this case WORKED for it and EARNED it..a valuable lesson to learn if the person was behind bars for theft or other illegal means of obtaining property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Well put. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angelus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. I don't agree with the idea one bit...
these people committed crimes, they knew they did and that the crimes were wrong, and they deserve to pay for their actions.

They're in jail/prison because they are being punished. Why should a rapist/murderer/extortionist be allowed to have the privileges of a free man?

Seems like most prisoners are living better off than I am, and it's not fair one bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. How are they better off than you?
Edited on Mon May-03-04 05:40 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
Most prisoners work while behind bars unless they are so dangerous they cannot be mixed with the general population.
They have lost their freedom and are behind bars. They are managed most of their day.
Watching a TV is a small perk. Nobody GAVE him the TV, he earned it and purchased it making a small amount of money...many corporations contract with prisons and get what is in essence slave labor as a result.

Again, the HUMANE treatment of prisoners has been proven effective over time in actually keeping the peace behind bars, thereby making life safer for the officers who guard those facilities. Yes the purpose is to PUNISH not animalize a person and make them unfit to function once they are released.

Certain treatments of prisoners behind bars such as deprivation actually have been found to create personality disorders.

People when determining what treatment is best for prisoners need to start considering what kind of person they wish to see be released when that prisoner's term is over...a person who is balanced who has NOT been treated inhumanely and therefore will have an easier time reassimilating...or a sensory deprived animal.

Taxpayers pay the bill when a guard is injured from a prison uprising or a violent occurence.
Again, most prison guards will tell you..the minor perks prisoners can earn for themselves help immensely to keep the peace behind bars.

Anyone who thinks a prisoner is better off than them has obviously not been inside the walls of a maximum security prison or youth facility.

Having worked with youth at risk in the past, I know the value of returning a human being to the streets rather than an institutionalized animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angelus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Well...where do I start?
Edited on Mon May-03-04 05:59 PM by Angelus
They get flat-screen tv's, they get cable, and they get free meals. None of them are paying for anything (except for the tv's.)

I'm out here in the real world, I have never committed a crime, and I have a harder time then any prisoner could ever dream of. I have to pay for rent. I have to pay for food. I don't have cable because I can't afford it. Hell, I only get to eat one or two meals a day, and that's if I'm lucky. I have to go to the laundry mat every week to do my laundry. My apartment sucks. It's dirty. My sink leaks all the time. I can't afford a plumber.

These people have murdered, raped, extorted money, tortured, and any other imaginable crime, and here they are with flat-screened tv's in their jail cells, they are gauranteed a meal, they always have clean clothes. Hell, they have medical coverage while they're in prison. I'm a free man and I have no medical insurance. Prisoners should be paying for their crimes instead of sitting around in their jail cells watching cable tv. How is this fair?

You ever hear the quote "If you do the crime, you pay the time?" Well, these people have committed horrible crimes, and they knew they did, and they should pay for them. Why give them rights that free people have?


I'm sorry, but I don't understand how you think these guys deserve freedoms for what they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Maybe you should give Susan McDougal a call
then again, perhaps you should read her book.

>I'm out here in the real world, I have never committed a crime, and I have a harder time then any prisoner could ever dream of.<

Susan McDougal got the worst the prison system could dish out for simply refusing to lie to Kenneth Starr. Her "heinious crime" was nothing more than not serving Bill Clinton up to Starr and his toadies on a platter. Should she have been subjected to her punishment?

There are heinous criminals in prison, and there are those who were falsely accused and couldn't afford to pay for a top attorney. With the advent of DNA testing, those who were falsely convicted have the hope of perhaps having a sentence overturned. Our prisons are also stuffed with people who made one poor decision, and now have 10 to 20 to think about the marijuana they may have bought or the pack of cigarettes they shoplifted in a moment of desperation. (I suppose prison might be a walk in the park to the guy who was strangled a couple of years ago by a local police officer for stealing a pack of cigarettes from a local Safeway.)

Prisons aren't an evening at the Ritz. Beatings and rapes are commonplace. The vast majority of prisoners are expected to work, and work a full day, for perhaps $1.

Whether or not you believe it, it's better for the guards to allow prisoners a privilege or two for good behavior; it'll keep the guards alive longer. It's also good for prisoners to get some education and job training. They'll get out and not reoffend. Our neighbor runs a faith-based program for prisoners that has a 90% success rate. They learn a trade, work with mentors to adjust to life on the "outside", and even though I'm not crazy about faith based funding, he's doing a hell of a job.

>These people have murdered, raped, extorted money, tortured, and any other imaginable crime, and here they are with flat-screened tv's in their jail cells, they are gauranteed a meal, they always have clean clothes. Hell, they have medical coverage while they're in prison. I'm a free man and I have no medical insurance. Prisoners should be paying for their crimes instead of sitting around in their jail cells watching cable tv. How is this fair?<

Prison medical coverage is nothing to write home about. They basically make sure the prisoner doesn't die in their care and not a lot more. The prisoners who have the televisions pay for them out of their own pockets; I'm sure that they are required to pay for cable as well if they have it. I also seem to remember that the famous prison administrator in Arizona bragged about the half-rotten food prisoners there are served.

Would you rather that the taxpayers' money went for training and rehabilitation, or would you like to continue paying $30K per year, per prisoner?

Julie


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angelus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. Well...their healthcare is still much better than mine.
Because at least they have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. Actually up to 50% of people in jail are African Americans and up to 10%
Edited on Mon May-03-04 07:10 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
are factually innocent as the Prison Project and Northwestern University have demonstrated so before we assess any creature comforts perhaps we should be questioning a system that allows that to occur.

As I stated in my first post to you, there are benefits to making sure that there are some accomodations..you know...idle hands being the devil's play and there is no shortage of devil's play in prisons.

I also MADE the point of making sure you knew those perceived benefits ALSO benefit the guards thereby benefiting the taxpayers who must pay for their injuries.
The point of prison is indeed to punish and unfortunately since the 70's based on faulty studies, people presumed that prisons should NOT be primarily for rehabilitation.

Interestingly enough you even collapse those that are there due to violent crimes with those that are there due to paverty crimes.

I can assure you having been inside major lockdown facilities and observing the politics both amongst prisoners among themselves and between themselves and the guards, it isn't a cakewalk and it is indeed punishment.

Having television is not tantamount to being in a country club.

Finally, if you are a renter and your sink leaks, it is the duty of the person you rent from to fix it not yours so again...some of your story doesn't ring true.

YOu might also want to double check what is informing your opinions since the majority of people behind bars are not there for violent crimes. An uninformed electorate is what has led to locking up so many non violent offenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angelus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. So...10% are innocent...
but the rest aren't. They're in jail serving time for CRIMES they have COMMITTED. They are in jail because they CHOSE to do the crime. If prisoners want sweet luxuries, they shouln't have committed the crimes they're serving for in the first place.

I'm sorry, but I don't see any point in letting prisoners(especially those who have committed high-profile crimes) sit in jail with their pretty little tv's. They should be sitting in their jail cell thinking about what they did. I don't see how people think it's ok for them to sit in a cell and watch MTV.

I'm sorry, but that's the way I feel and I'm not going to think differently on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. I think your real problem
isn't the way the prisoners are treated. It is (or should be IMHO) the plight of the poor here in the United States.

Think about it. Are you really suggesting that prisoners, all of them not just the worst of them, should have significantly less than you? That's the standard? You have stated that you only eat 1-2 meals per day if you are lucky. What should they get then? A meal every other day? One a week?

No, that's not the answer. You should be concerned with the societal illness that suggests that it is ok for anyone to live in your circumstances, especially given the amount of wealth in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimchi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #34
62. "felon" doesn't mean "violent"
Here in VA a friend of mine was convicted of a felony for...wait for it...stealing a stereo system of a friend who pissed him off by stealing something of his. They both went to jail, so much for vendettas. At the time, stealing anything worth over $200 was a felony. Yeah, I can see how these two were a menace to society. Lock them up and throw away the key--these FELONS committed such horrible, horrible crimes, right???????????

Everyone thinks "felon" means you've done something horrible, and that just isn't true. Being caught with an ounce of weed is a felony. Please be aware that the confusion of this term is deliberately used to divide us even further.

Let those who have exhibited good behavior and pay for it themselves have their damn TV sets. At least they aren't raping or fighting each other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. Exactly WHAT
Edited on Mon May-03-04 05:33 PM by Karenina
is the purpose of this thread? :shrug:
And WHERE is the author? :eyes:
Can you spell B-A-N-D-W-I-D-T-H boys and girls? I KNEW you could!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. I know there are people who think prisoners should suffer greatly.....
but I don't see how it does society any good to make life absolutely unbearable for people in prison. It doesn't help our world for someone to leave prison with an anger and negativity that is worse than when they got in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markomalley Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. I think it's great...and the prisoners shouldn't have to pay for it
Look...these people will someday emerge from prison. If we treat them like they are dirt for the 5, 10, 20 years they spend behind bars, they will emerge more bitter and meaner than they were going in and will be a greater danger to society.

Personally, I think that this is a good idea.

But, I also think that they should have minimal restraints to protect society until they are rehabilitated. They should be getting a full spectrum of mental health, medical, and educational benefits while they are away -- we should concentrate on doing what is needed to cure them of the illness that caused them to commit the crime to begin with. It may involve curing some organic condition or it may involve some intense re-education effort to undo psychological trauma that they experienced as a child. But we need to apply a more modern, rehabilitative approach to them.

What ever happened to charity and forgiveness???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Screw charity and forgiveness, rehabilitation is just good public policy
and punishment bad and short-sighted public policy. Appealing to forgiveness for criminals will not get you far in this world (even if you're right). I think the practical arguments you made were much stronger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markomalley Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. It is just another way that our sick society must change...
...we can rehabilitate all we want, but if society doesn't do forgiveness and charity, they will not be allowed to be productive citizens once they return to society. That is the second biggest problem with our prison system right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
33. You fucking pinko agitators SHOULD support it...
Who knows when Ashcroft's thugs will come for you. Might as well have a flat-screen TV while in the can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. Seven inches isn't even enough to give me penis envy.
What's the big deal?

They pay for the privilege, and it spares them the violence of the common room. Problem with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
38. Fine with me. Besides, 7 inches is tiny and at least the content won't
be underfunded like the content of their libraries are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Too...many...possible...penis jokes...brain overload! Zap! Crash!
We apologize, but the content of the previous post was too much for bigbillhaywood's juvenile gutter mind to handle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
44. well he earned it and payed for it himself....
and it is given only if they have a clean discipline record...so hey it's a good plan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
46. yes
sounds like a good program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
50. No, Prison is supposed to be punishment.
Why should some asshole murderer be allowed to enjoy TV or anything else while his victim rots and the victim's family grieves? They should be breaking rocks all day or something equally unpleasant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angelus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Thank you!
I agree 100%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #50
58. It is? I thought the purpose of our penal system was rehabilitation.
In case you failed to notice from the article, prisoners are not "given" these sets -- they have to buy them with the few dollars per day that they earn for doing work while in prison.

Furthermore, you confined your argument strictly to people convicted of murder. Would that argument also apply to people in prison for, say, nonviolent drug offenses? What about burglary? Should we make prison life for these people as unpleasant as possible, with an eye on punishing them rather than helping to make them productive members of society upon their eventual release?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
52. Sure...
"Krahmer bought the $300 television with money he earned working in prison, where he is paid a few dollars a day for computer drafting. Inmates also must have clean discipline records to qualify for the flat-screens."

Sounds like what prison is suppose to do...

Instead of complaining about they're cells, non-prisoners whould complain about their own...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
55. Damn, so that's all I need to do to get a job in the future!
Do a crime, go to jail. I'll have free room and board, work to do, get new skills, and state of the art TV!

Isn't America great?

I see the rationalization on the part of the cops, but when the people on the outside world lose their jobs and everything else, I have to say NO to this. I think it's scary that prisoners get more advantages than people trying to make a living in this shithole of a society that's being re-engineered by the corporate sickness...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
56. Since he paid for it himself...
at prison wages, I have NO problem with it. He could have just as easily spent the money on junk food or cigarettes and no one would have said anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
59. Angelus and Hypno should go to jail
if they think it's such a good deal. Since I've been there I KNOW that it would take a lot more than a 7" flat screen TV. prison doctors and prison food to make me want to go back. A lot more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
60. As long as the inmates (or their loved ones) pay for them
If it cuts down on inmates fighting over the tv, then it makes the CO's jobs easier and it is good to cut down on violence inside of prisons.

I'm wondering about power sources, though. In Michigan, inmates have to buy a specific model of tv that takes batteries, so they don't use state electricity. Is this a similar thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
61. Sure, keep them sedated...
TV is a mind-numbing tool. Letting prisoners watch it constantly would help prevent prison riots..."C'mon, Joe, we're breaking out now!!!" "Nah, there's a good 'Love Boat' re-run comin' on now. Maybe tomorrow?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC