nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:35 PM
Original message |
Rangle just called for Articles of Impeachment |
|
Edited on Thu May-06-04 12:35 PM by nadinbrzezinski
on the floor of the House....
while discussing HR 627
|
RetroLounge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This I have to hear for myself...
RL
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
if Bush should not fire Rummy, then the House should draw Articles of Impeachment since this has risen to high crimes and misdemeanors
|
Demonaut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. I heard it too, Rangle has big cajones, then it was promptly ignored |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. This is the second call in 24 hours |
|
CALL your congress critters NOW... feed them often, even the pubs may turn once they realize the turd we have in the WH
|
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
StephNW4Clark
(547 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
No2W2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. they're talking about a resolution |
|
condemning prisoner "abuse"
Rangle called for congress to do it's duty and impeach shrub for witholding information from congress.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What does it mean?? Will he be able to do such a thing? Wouldn't he need the support of Repubs in order to do that??
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. Yes and from hearing the floor |
|
we may even get the rational pubs on our side.
|
burythehatchet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
32. Here's a way to mobilize the left |
|
i.e., if we can effectively try Bush in public - a defacto impeachment - I can see the country mobilized to the extent that in November, the result will be assured.
|
quinnox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It is high time for impeachment.
|
AgentLadyBug
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
42. NO - vote him out..... |
|
Edited on Thu May-06-04 01:08 PM by AgentLadyBug
the biggest thing america needs is for its *people* (the 4th branch of government) to do something right - voting jackass out would be perfect...
let the impeacment discussion happen, then die off, leaving bush a sitting duck for november......
additionally, not impeaching will give voters strong incentive to vote the repub house bums out too.....
<edit: oh - lol - we're impeaching rummy, not bush... nevermind...>
|
Voltaire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Lets hope that is the beginning |
|
It needs to be made an issue and put into the public consciousness, it doesn't matter that DeLay is in charge. Make the dumbasses defend themselves against it. Watch the polls as folks from all over demand impeachment. Good for Charlie
|
LandOLincoln
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Rangel accusing Rummy, * & Co. of "high crimes and misdemeanors," |
|
Edited on Thu May-06-04 12:40 PM by LandOLincoln
and talking impeachment.
WAY TO GO CHARLIE!!
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. OMG, the time has COME |
bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. They are war criminals and profiteers. |
chimpymustgo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Not calling for Bush impeachment |
|
Just Rummy.
Rummy must be fired, resign or face impeachment.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. Actually Rummy serves at the pleasure |
|
of the President, Rangel is aiming for Shruby
|
markus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
25. Not true. The Consitution says "all civil officers" |
|
Section 4. The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
29. Whether a cabinet secretary is a civil officer or not is an open question. |
|
Civil officers, at the time of the Founders, were people like Collectors of Ports, and such.
The Constitution is silent on the very existence of a cabinet.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
31. Correct, that is why they are confirmed |
|
This would have to go to the Court... the Supreme Court.
We may be entering new territory
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
|
is now going over hte sacrificial lamb, aka the sergeants... and leave the officers in charge and CIA and contractors, off the hook
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
36. House Judiciary committee staff report.... |
|
...may be found here. Who is impeachable, and who is a civil officer, and who is covered by Art ii.2.2 of the Constitution is not a completely settled question.
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Rumsfeld cannot be impeached... |
|
..only the President, perhaps the vice president, and federal judges can be impeached.
Rumsfeld, once confirmed, serves at the pleasure of the President.
|
keithyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Why is it only the African-Americans in Congress seem to have courage? |
|
My representative make me ill!
|
AgentLadyBug
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
47. Because they have no power..... |
|
it's a standard dynamic..... those without power are liberal, innovative, challenging..... those with power are conservative, closed, and so forth....
there are more-or-less sound reasons for this dynamic, and it's VERY wide ranging... For a more abstract discussion of this, see Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
|
Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Charlie Rangle would make a GREAT VP! I respect him more than almost anyone in Washington! Charlie Rangle is a true Patriot and his service to his country speaks for it's self! God Bless Charlie!
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I hope someone posts a link to this at LBN or here... |
|
I want to send this to a friend of mine in Canada who says we should begin impeachment hearings against *.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. Will start scanning the wires for you |
|
Edited on Thu May-06-04 12:47 PM by nadinbrzezinski
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
35. Thank you. My friend will be pleased. |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
37. Here is the reuters filing |
KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
22. How Much Longer Does The U.N. Sit By? |
|
Aren't these war crimes being committed? Certainly there's plenty of cause for an International investigation to begin. Is that the U.N. or the World Court? You can't tell me the BFEE has those people paid off, too.
|
Oddman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Kennedy live on C-Span2 now |
|
Calling for full investigation . . . “I’m sorry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .that we got caught!”
|
Oddman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. Kennedy is ripping bush to shreads! |
quinnox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
27. Kennedy! "The buck stops at the White house" |
|
And the president should apologize to the Iraqi people.... a fall from grace for this country...
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
30. Remember Kennedy cannot call for impeachment |
|
oh and Rosa DeLauro just called for bicameral hearings... LORD this is getting huge
|
StephNW4Clark
(547 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
39. Democrat from California |
|
God, another Congressman is quoting the Consittution and asking for an investigation, INDEPENDENT investigation, John Spratt, D-South Carolina
Calls for Articles of Impeachment and calls for investigation...
This is just starting folks, I hate to say it but we may be seeing the turning point ...
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
49. Why do you hate to say it? |
|
It sounds like perfectly wonderful news to me! Am I missing something?
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
53. That it TOOK THIS for the worm to finally turn |
|
Mr. and MRS average American
|
revcarol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
51. DeLauro is from New Haven, CT |
|
Wow, at least one Democrat in CT has some cajones - and it's a woman!
|
greenbriar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
38. Why can't Kennedy call for impeachment? |
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
40. proceedings can only be initiated by the majority party (Republicans) n/t |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
41. The house introduces the articles |
|
the Senate convicts, it is purely procedural
|
loudsue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
44. Impeachment has to start in the House, not the Senate.... |
|
Kennedy's a Senator.
I believe I'm correct on this.....other DUers?? Is this right?
:kick:
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
|
Once the impeachment is decided on, the hearing is held in the Senate.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
28. Keep us informed cannot watch both |
|
or I could, C-SPAN also runs on the web
|
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
45. Quick transcript here |
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
46. Tom Harkin now - accusing Negroponte (Honduras0 |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
48. This is going to sink hte GOP |
|
you notice the panic? I have...
|
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Did anyone hear about Charlie Rangle drawing up articles of Impeachment on C-Span? (Vanity) Me | 5/6/04
Posted on 05/06/2004 11:03:13 AM PDT by areafiftyone
Sorry for the Vanity I am reading this on the liberal boards and DU? I only trust Freepers. Did anyone else watch Charlie (I know its hard to listen to him)?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions KEYWORDS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 posted on 05/06/2004 11:03:14 AM PDT by areafiftyone < Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: areafiftyone They tried to impeach Reagan 3 times. If it's true, it won't go anywhere.
2 posted on 05/06/2004 11:04:03 AM PDT by Pete < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Pete This makes me sooo mad!
3 posted on 05/06/2004 11:04:23 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: areafiftyone For Rumsfeld.
They are going after Negraponte now.
4 posted on 05/06/2004 11:05:49 AM PDT by Howlin < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: areafiftyone Here is a rough estimate from one of the boards: Looks like its for Rumsfeld not Bush.
"...an atmosphere where all of the people in iraq have been demonized, where it appears to american people and certainly to our military that the people in iraq are responsible for 911 and causing us pain, that the secretary of defense did have info months ago about these atrocities and that he kept it from the president, he kept it from the Congress, and he kept it from the American people.
I think that this rises to the point that it's a high crime and a misdemeanor, if he disappointed the president, kept information from the congress and kept this information from the american people, I think America and the world wants us to show the outrage, not by rhetoric, but by taking action!
And if the president doesn't fire the secretary, if he doesn't resign, I think it's the responsibility of this Congress to file articles of impeachment and force him to leave office.
Then the whole world would know, not just our military, not just Americans, but the whole world what we stand for.
f people can say mission completed when it looks like there's victory, and we see atrocities like this and it happens on someone's watch. If they don't have the dignity to say, "I'm sorry," and move on, the we have the responsibility under our Constitution to remove these people from office. He kept the info away from this congress. We have the responsibility of oversight. I'm preparing articles of impeachment today.
5 posted on 05/06/2004 11:06:56 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Howlin Dam I wish this prison thing had never happened. The liberals were looking for an opening to get Rummy.
6 posted on 05/06/2004 11:08:04 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: areafiftyone It's time we start stringing up a few of these worthless democrats
7 posted on 05/06/2004 11:09:49 AM PDT by MJY1288 (John Kerry Was a Blue Ribbon Finalist in the 1st. Annual V.V.A.W. Medals Toss in Wash. D.C. 1971) < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies >
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |