Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's "evildoers" them and "wrongdoers" us = Evangelical codespeak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 03:34 PM
Original message
Bush's "evildoers" them and "wrongdoers" us = Evangelical codespeak
Found this interesting nugget on christianity.com:

King David of Israel once wrote about "friendly fire." In the 37th Psalm he began with these words, "Do not fret because of evildoers, be not envious toward wrongdoers." The word fret means "to become heated." The idea was that someone did something that caused your blood to boil. Now there are two kinds of people who can get you all fired up. The Bible calls them evildoers and wrongdoers. Evildoers are people who just don't like you and will fire upon you anytime they have the opportunity. Wrongdoers on the other hand, are people who don't mean to hurt you but somehow it just happens. David was talking about "friendly fire." And, unfortunately, all of us are going to be burned by it from time to time.

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:a2wlk_NSG5AJ:resources.christianity.com/servlets/PlaylistBuilder%3Fstoreid%3Dchristianity%26id%3D20846%26media%3Dword_application%26bandwidth%3DFriendly_Fire%26fileext%3Ddoc+%22wrongdoers%22+evildoers%22&hl=en

Not that I think Bush has ever even opened a bible, but no doubt he was advised by Hughes and/or Rove to insert these distinctive codewords to separate "us good Christians with those hellbound Muslims."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Political_Junkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's explains why he refers to
Edited on Mon May-10-04 03:39 PM by Political_Junkie
the soldiers in the Abu Ghraib photos as "wrongdoers" guess they didn't mean to hurt us with those photos.

edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. yeah I should've provided that context
he's used it a couple times... including Saturday's radio address:

What took place in that Iraqi prison was the wrongdoing of a few, and does not reflect the character of the more than 200,000 military personnel who have served in Iraq since the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

the first reference was Bush with Abdullah saying: "I've told His Majesty as plainly as I could that the wrongdoers will be brought to justice and that the actions of those folks in Iraq do not represent the values of the United States of America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 03:42 PM
Original message
CROSSFIRE NOW...Walker (R) says "Wrongdoers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandaod Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, so that's what that little squirrel brain
of his was thinking. I wondered about it when I heard him call them "wrongdoers", as opposed to "evildoers". Thanks for the explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I noticed that he made the distinction right away
It stuck out. The American torturers were "wrongdoers."

These people are beyond sick.

http://www.wgoeshome.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. If You're A Self-Centered Asshole
Then anything that happens or anything is said that you don't like is "evil" and "they" do it.

Wrongdoers is like a pet owner trying to baptize a cat with shampoo and water; it's wrong and unnecessary from the cat's point of view but needed nonetheless.

Dimbo needs to be baptized next November.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC