Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REDLEGS! Sound off! T.V. show for us to watch tonight.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:43 PM
Original message
REDLEGS! Sound off! T.V. show for us to watch tonight.
http://www.historychannel.com/global/listings/listings.jsp?NetwCode=THC

On History Channel: Modern Marvels, 10 - 11 PM

Cannons
Cannons have fired balls of iron and atomic bombs, changed the way wars are fought, and now come equipped with smart weapons. Beginning with 13th-century cannons that were designed to penetrate forts of the day, we'll see how cannons were first cast and later forged, and show how large cannons terrorized civilians and soldiers in WWI and WWII. Moving to the present, we feature the 40-ton self-propelled Crusader that launches 100-pound steel artillery shells more than 33 miles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Crusader program got the kibosh......(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, I know.
And it fucking sucks too. That's what you get when you have people who never served making decisions for the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I had seen the HC special before...
The Crusader was something else. Simply unbelievible, how fast and accurate it could direct fire.

I think it could fire something like 12 shells at various parabolic angles, allowing each shell to reach the target simultaneously.

I can't remember what sank it? Did it have the usual cost overruns/no real need or was it the "faster lighter" mentality? How can you get any faster and lighter then a self propelled artillery piece?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The decision was made because...
...it didn't fit in with the vision of the military that Chaney and Rumsfeld has in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ahhh...the faster lighter myopia..... (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Redleg checking in...
I missed the show. How was it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC