Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Officials leaking THE abuse LEADS to RUMSFELD'S DOOR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
spooked Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 11:45 AM
Original message
CIA Officials leaking THE abuse LEADS to RUMSFELD'S DOOR
Black Ops SO SECRET it didn't even have an office or budget

http://rwor.org/a/1241/hersh.htm

Revelations Lead to Rumsfeld's Door
Revolutionary Worker #1241, May 23, 2004, posted at http://rwor.org

As we go to press, senior CIA officials, both past and present, have reportedly leaked that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld approved the extreme interrogation methods used against Iraqi detainees under U.S. control. Their accounts appear in a New Yorker article by investigative journalist Seymour Hersh (May 24 available at http://newyorker.com).

These revelations have far-reaching implications--first because they document that the approval of torture was made at the very highest levels of the government, and second, because an intensifying inner-ruling class struggle has now erupted with such ferocity that it is breaking into the headlines.

If confirmed, Hersh's allegations would almost certainly undermine Rumsfeld personally. But they will also affect the ability of the U.S. government to pursue its current course in Iraq and could shake the very legitimacy of the whole current ruling clique.

The heads of the U.S. government have, all of them, denied that they authorized torture--in Iraq or anywhere else. They have blamed a few vicious low-level prison guards for all the extreme abuse that has come to light. And now, it appears that they have been exposed--standing at the very center of a monstrous web of lies and horrific brutality.

Seymour Hersh's article opens with the following words:

"The roots of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal lie not in the criminal inclinations of a few Army reservists but in a decision, approved last year by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, to expand a highly secret operation, which had been focussed on the hunt for Al Qaeda, to the interrogation of prisoners in Iraq."

Hersh continues: "According to interviews with several past and present American intelligence officials, the Pentagon's operation, known inside the intelligence community by several code words, including Copper Green, encouraged physical coercion and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners in an effort to generate more intelligence about the growing insurgency in Iraq."

Hersh claims that in the fall of 2001, Rumsfeld set up a special kind of military covert "black op" called a Special Access Program (SAP). For this SAP, the Pentagon, CIA and NSA gave advance approval to quickly capture, assassinate, or brutally interrogate anyone targeted, anywhere in the world. Hersh reports that President Bush was informed of the operation. A former CIA official summed up, "The rules are `Grab whom you must. Do what you want.' "

This SAP was first focused on al-Qaida and Taliban forces in Afghanistan, and then its reach was extended far more widely, including to counterinsurgency operations in Iraq.

SAP torture and assassination methods were first applied in Iraq during the push to capture Saddam Hussein. Then, with the rapid growth of the Iraqi insurgency last fall, the Pentagon was reportedly frustrated by the failure of U.S. military and CIA forces to penetrate the resistance. Rumsfeld approved and his Deputy Stephen Cambone implemented SAP operations targeted on the anti-occupation resistance forces among Iraq's people--including specifically "getting tough" with Iraqis held in U.S.-controlled prisons. Military interrogators in Iraqi prisons were brought under the control of SAP operations. Hersh reports that the methods approved for Abu Ghraib included sexual humiliation--which were recommended based on detailed scholarly study of "Arab culture and psychology." Photos were taken of extreme sexual humiliation in order to blackmail prisoners into acting as informants.

This approval, these methods and the SAP itself have, up until now, been among the most closely guarded state secrets. They were so super-covert that they had no budget, no office, and were not even officially classified "top secret"--they simply didn't officially exist, except for any information they extracted by torture, which was funneled to the military command.

One of Hersh's CIA sources sums up that the special operation developed against al-Qaida was now used against "cabdrivers, brothers-in-law and people pulled off the streets."

Rumsfeld, his Pentagon commanders and the whole Bush administration denied that torture--in Abu Ghraib or anywhere else--had official approval. This was repeated by Rumsfeld in his appearances before Congress last week. Commenting on Rumsfeld's denials, a senior CIA official said to Seymour Hersh, "Some people think you can bullshit anyone."

Before Hersh's article had even appeared in newsstands, Pentagon spokesman Lawrence Di Rita denounced it as "outlandish, conspiratorial, and filled with error and anonymous conjecture."

However, even before Hersh's latest report, there has been clear evidence that the torture, murder and bizarre sexual abuse of prisoners were being carried out on a worldwide scale. Every day new revelations have come out about how the U.S. military and CIA treated prisoners--rape, forced public masturbation and anal penetration, biting dogs, violent beatings, severe burning of prisoners, electric shock and telling prisoners their female relatives would be hunted down and raped. Many cases are surfacing that document prisoners being beaten and tortured to death.

And it was increasingly unmistakable that all this had been approved (and even demanded) at the very highest levels of the U.S. government--including in the Pentagon, the CIA, the Justice Department, and ultimately the White House itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do you remember the directive rummy gave immediately after 9/11?
Words to the effect of "go broadbased. Sweep up everything. Relevant or not."

I'll have to look that one up. Just saw it here on DU somewhere today.

He was pushing it even then. Only, nobody realized specifically what he was talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah. I do remember that,
now that you mention it. It was from Day 1, when Rummy wanted to attack Iraq for 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oct. 1st 2001 RUMSFELD & ASHCROFT
Edited on Tue May-18-04 12:02 PM by spooked
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F7071FF83E590C728CDDA90994D9404482

NATIONAL DESK | October 1, 2001, Monday
A NATION CHALLENGED: THE THREATS; Defense Secretary Warns Of Unconventional Attacks

"Mr. Ashcroft and Mr. Rumsfeld appeared to be highlighting the risks from terrorism that have prompted their departments to propose new strategies for combating terrorism. Mr. Ashcroft is
pushing Congress to enact quickly a package of bills that would give the government significantly more authority to detain suspected terrorists, conduct electronic surveillance and seize assets of suspected terrorist organizations"

IS THIS "PACKAGE OF BILLS" the Patriot Act??
We need to read those "bills" as they were originally proposed!

Help anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treepig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. the patriot act?
do you mean the usa patriot act?

ok, the baffled reader might wonder where this post is going, but i thought i'd take this opportunity to share something i just learned (yeah, i'm no doubt an incredibly slow learner), namely,the full name of this act (yup, it's quite the clever acronym)


Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism

gawd, does it ever make me proud to know the guardians of my safety can think this type of thing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. I keep hearing that the Pentagon denies the Hersh article, yet
if you read this statement which always accompanies pieces on his article:

Before Hersh's article had even appeared in newsstands, Pentagon spokesman Lawrence Di Rita denounced it as "outlandish, conspiratorial, and filled with error and anonymous conjecture."

Di Rita doesn't say Hersh is wrong.

1. Its outlandish? - yes, the behavior of Rummy is outlandish.

2. Conspiratorial? - conspiracies aren't always incorrect - they might be ahead of prevailing wisdom, but not incorrect.

3. Filled with error? - Perhaps Di Rita could fill in the gaps and errors.

4. Anonymous Conjecture? - Uh, yeah, Larry, no one wants to come out and say, with their own signature block, that the emperor not only has no clothes, but he also is a friggin' war criminal. Think that might endanger the health of the source, Lar? The health of his family? Hell, knowing the background of this cabal, the health of his ancestors?

Nope, another nice non-denial denial. Its true. Sad, very sad, very unAmerican, and true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthbetold Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh my God.
This is big. Huge. We need to jump right on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes we do.
Did you read what the NBC/Reuter's photographers are claiming? This stuff is just SICK!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. If this doesn't prove the case beyond a shadow of doubt....
I don't know what does.

Rumsfeld is a lying, cheating, war criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Was there ever any doubt?
Edited on Tue May-18-04 03:41 PM by Generator
Big forces are ratting on Scummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC