KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-11-03 07:24 PM
Original message |
CNCB says: Auunold would NOT get coverage if it was 1987! Because..... |
|
the "Fairness Doctrine" would have required equal time to challengers. But now they don't have to give the time.
They also said when Reagan ran for Governor the "Networks" didn't run his movies because of the "Fairness Doctrin" because they felt it would be non-compliant.......but they pointed out that Auunold has had HIS movies running behind the huge coverage he has been given everywhere.....and nothing prevents his movies being shown as "hype" for his candidacy.
Their segment on this story was: "Why are you seeing so much "Schwartz" coverage? Well......this is why you are seeing it.....but just expect that "we cables & networks will "try" at least to tone it down about his "Terminator Movies" because we will "try to be fair" even though "by law" we aren't "bound to" since the "Fairness Doctrine" is gone..........BUT TRUST US....we will try to be balanced.
OMG! The total hypocracy of these Media folks. But, to be fair, CNBC GAVE IT TO US STRAIGHT! by sayin......hey! we don't like all this time we devote to "Auunold" but the "Fairness Doctrine is GONE!" WTF do you want us to to do.......we have to make a living , too! That's what I heard from this report....but I'm glad they put it out there.....drip....drip.....drip......
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-11-03 07:28 PM
Response to Original message |
1. fair...what is fair....this is corporatism all the way..they pick what we |
liberalhistorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-11-03 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. At the same time, the majority of Californians say they would |
|
ditch Davis and vote for Ahhnold, so frankly the media is only giving people what they want! If people didn't want it, they wouldn't watch it and they wouldn't vote for Schwarzenegger.
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-11-03 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. i disagree....this is called manipulation....there is push and pull.... |
|
this is pushed in our faces
|
Democat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-11-03 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. You are right and wrong! |
|
Most people in California don't like Davis according to the media. The main reason that Californians don't like Davis is because the media in California is activist against Davis and has been for years.
They treat Davis almost worse than they treated Clinton.
At the same time, they constantly defend and promote how great Bush is while he has even more problems surrounding him that Davis does.
You are understimating the power of the media to influence, rather than report, events.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-11-03 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. If they hate Davis, they should hate Bush more |
|
The Federal deficit is worse than California's. There's no other explanation except media influence, I think you're exactly right.
|
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-11-03 08:46 PM
Response to Original message |
5. A DU poster said that Auunold got an hour's coverage of his speech/Gore 15 |
|
minutes or so.
Who's more important?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message |