Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The regulations reguarding shrub declairing Martial Law...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
No2W2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 07:07 PM
Original message
The regulations reguarding shrub declairing Martial Law...
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
TITLE 32--NATIONAL DEFENSE
SUBTITLE A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
CHAPTER V--DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
SUBCHAPTER A--AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
PART 501--EMPLOYMENT OF TROOPS IN AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES

67 FR 30627
§ 501.4

Martial law.

It is unlikely that situations requiring the commitment of Federal Armed Forces will necessitate the declaration of martial law. When Federal Armed Forces are committed in the event of civil disturbances, their proper role is to support, not supplant, civil authority. Martial law depends for its justification upon public necessity. Necessity gives rise to its creation; necessity justifies its exercise; and necessity limits its duration. The extent of the military force used and the actual measures taken, consequently, will depend upon the actual threat to order and public safety which exists at the time. In most instances the decision to impose martial law is made by the President, who normally announces his decision by a proclamation, which usually contains his instructions concerning its exercise and any limitations thereon. However, the decision to impose martial law may be made by the local commander on the spot, if the circumstances demand immediate action, and time and available communications facilities do not permit obtaining prior approval from higher authority (§ 501.2). Whether or not a proclamation exists, it is incumbent upon commanders concerned to weigh every proposed action against the threat to public order and safety it is designed to meet, in order that the necessity therefor may be ascertained. When Federal Armed Forces have been committed in an objective area in a martial law situation, the population of the affected area will be informed of the rules of conduct and other restrictive measures the military is authorized to enforce. These will normally be announced by proclamation or order and will be given the widest possible publicity by all available media. Federal Armed Forces ordinarily will exercise police powers previously inoperative in the affected area, restore and maintain order, insure the essential mechanics of distribution, transportation, and communication, and initiate necessary relief measures.

http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_00/32cfr501_00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've been worrying about that for a long time

Judging by their past actions, Bush and his backers would certainly consider the possibility of losing an election to be "necessity" enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. There are not enough military left in the US. No martial law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ditto Senior citizen.........
Jeb declared martial law a long time ago and I never heard why. It scared me though. This whole mafia White House scares me. Did I ever DREAM that I would be scared by who ever was in power at anytime? Hell no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They Crank up the Draft and Send Draftees to Iraq...
...and bring the NG home to maintain order (like they've been doing over there :mad:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. If we were really smart...
we would ask the the ACLU to examine the law and announce in advance what would not be allowed - by scenario or otherwise.

Then, Congress would ask for a meeting with the President to define the conditions under which the President should act.

In other words, we would plan with plenty of contingencies all based on the law, the constitution, the bill of rights - with the full intent of not taking punitive action on innocent people - meaning robbing them of their rights.

Get it out in the open and in advance.

We can't get caught again like we did on the 12 of December in 2000. Shocked. Awed. Stunned. Lost. Acquiesing. After which we went through the stages of loss - grief, anger, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Like Bush ever let a stoopid rule
ever stand in the way of him doing exactly what
he wants to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No2W2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. The regulations are vague.
Edited on Fri May-21-04 08:13 PM by No2W2004
"Martial law depends for its justification upon public necessity."

WTF is public necessity? Who determines public necessity?

SHRUB DOES!!!

Could he actually get away with thinking that jebus deems it necessary for him to continue as president and then create the disasters to make it happen?
:scared:

EDIT: oops! Mark of the Beast post!

:evilfrown::evilgrin::mad::nuke::grr::headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC