Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Less troops = democrat? False!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Kiliki Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 02:15 AM
Original message
Less troops = democrat? False!
Edited on Mon May-24-04 02:16 AM by Kiliki
Just out of curiosity after reading the Hillary goes republican thread I decided to search out the numbers for the RIF program of the early 90s.

Remember, Clinton was sworn into office in January of 1993 so with that in mind, next time you hear a conservative say democrats just want to strip the military you can respond no, that's what republicans do-

http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/DAHSUM/1992/ch07.htm

snip
The Chief of Staff and the Secretary of the Army accordingly approved a plan for fiscal years 1990-95 to reduce Army end strength primarily through voluntary separations and secondarily through involuntary measures. During FY 1992, the Army used a number of programs to reshape the Army, including Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC), Retention Control Point (RCP) changes, Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) mandated reductions, and Enhancement of CONUS Contingency Corps (EC3). The most important programs, however, were the VET, VSI, and SSB. Approximately 64,000 soldiers took advantage of these three programs during the fiscal year.

snip
To maximize voluntary losses and reduce involuntary separations, the Secretary of the Army extended the VSI/SSB application window from 29 February to 1 May 1992.

The results of these programs exceeded the Army's expectations. Approximately 100,000 soldiers left the Army during the fiscal year, with more than 52,000 of them departing under the VSI/SSB and VET programs. These actions left the Army's end strength closer to 610,000 than the anticipated 640,000. Personnel readiness and Authorized Level of Organization (ALO) decreased significantly during the summer, when the bulk of the soldiers separated from the Army under these programs. Because the Army could not match the unexpectedly rapid reduction in personnel with a corresponding decrease in authorized positions, it faced a shortage of soldiers to meet requirements. MOS shortages were expected to continue in future fiscal years.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rex 555 Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. A bit off topic,but....
Les Aspin was Clinton's first Sec.of Defense. After just weeks in office,when things in Somalia went wrong,HE RESIGNED! The Somalia situation was a GHWB time bomb.
GHWB sent them there and left it for those that kicked his ass in 1992.

Democrats have accountability and respect for the office that they were appointed to.

Oh!,those were the days!

Les Aspin died shortly after this. He was a very good congressman from WIS.

If I am wrong here please correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hi rex 555!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC