Randy Says it's CHOCOLATY Sovereignty..

[namvet73]

This had me cracking up. On Tuesday, 5/25, Randy analyzed Bush's speech on the "handover" on June 30. She makes the ridiculousness of things obvious through analogy. Randy describes it, this way...

This isn't really going to be a sovereign government. It's a sovereign i-n-t-e-r-i-m government. It's
sortof a…. sortof a kind of hand over of SOME power to some sortof a kind of INTERIM government in
Iraq. But, of course, we have not set any date for us to leave. So it's a… it's a handover in name only. You
know what it reminds me of? Ever eat something that's supposed to be chocolate, but, of course, it's not really
chocolate? Ssso, they call it "chocolaty?" And they'll say it's like full of chocolaty goodness?
Do you know? Cause there's no chocolate in it? So we should call this chocolaty sovereignty.. Because
there's really no so sovereignty in it. It's just.. chocolaty sovereignty. It's just ehh, sovereignly sovereignty
or something it's… it's just.. give it another name, because there's nooo, if ya look up sovereign in the.. in
the dictionary as I asked her to do, you'll see that there's no way that it could be PARTIAL <emphasis on
the P>. There's no such thing as PARTIAL…. SOVEREIGNTY. There's no.. such.. thing. So,
apparently the Iraqis can now have all the power they want, but they won't be able to plug anything in.
Do ya know what I mean?

[namvet73]

1. Sorry for the mistake, it's Randi, not Randy.. n/t