Andy_Stephenson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:09 PM
Original message |
BBV:"One of the terrorists' top goals may be to |
|
manipulate this fall's presidential elections... according to U.S. officials."
So that is how they plan on winning the election...Say the terrorists must have manipulated it...Go to the SCOUTS and get the results nullified. No paper ballot...no proof.
Nice and easy.
|
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They've "set it up" in the Media. Public is awar...then they just "DO IT" |
|
and they have their "Cover." Hate to see this...but we did know it was coming. "We" :D Yes....WE...knew, and know. :-(
|
stellanoir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Perhaps we should do something about it. . . ? |
|
Edited on Wed May-26-04 07:19 PM by stellanoir
Support HR 2239 & s1980! Time is growing short.
|
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
3. That whole angle is making me nuts!! |
|
They aren't saying WHO these "US officials" are -- the ones expressing "concern."
They aren't saying whether this "concern" is based on any intelligence, or just a hunch.
They aren't saying in which way, how, or why terrorists would want to affect our elections. They're just kind of floating it out there, to make use of later.
If there's an attack, a vote for Kerry is a vote for the terrorists -- it's just like Spain!
If there's no attack, the Chimp has kept us safe!
If Kerry stays ahead, as you point out, the terrorists have manipulated the election!
If the Chimp, God forbid, wins... well, I can't even think about that.
|
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Someone else suggested this one: if Kerry stays ahead in polls, but there's an attack or a major threat right before the election, Bush can mysteriously "win" (BBV) and it'll be attributed to the "We won't let the terrorists influence our election!" emotion.
|
Pobeka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message |
5. We need to cogently make the argument that the terrorists are pro Bush. |
|
He's been a better marketing tool than they dreamed possible.
He turns a blind eye by while Pakistan pays off the 9/11 ringleader.
He's too cozy with the Saudi's, where most terrorists originate.
If I was a terrorist, I'd want Bush in the White House instead of John Kerry.
|
GoBlue
(930 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
6. No thats how they play to postpone the election indefinitely... |
|
for reasons of National Security. I'm confident the SCrOTUS will give their blessing. I smelled this coming along time ago.
Bush is Fubar
|
greatauntoftriplets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Interesting, very interesting. Also scary, and plausible.
I've never believed that they would let go, that one way or another something will derail the election.
|
DoYouEverWonder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Asscrack just about said |
|
that if the American people vote for Kerry instead of Bu$h, it's because the terrorists influenced the election.
These shitheads sure have some twisted logic.
|
greatauntoftriplets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Same argument the Aznar people used in Spain.... |
|
...after the Madrid bombings. The Spanish people think that is a crock of you-know-what.
|
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-04 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Perhaps this will be their excuse when caught? It was the terrorists!! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |