How dare they!

[ibegurpard]

"How dare they drag the good name of the United States of America though the mud of Saddam Hussein's torture prisons!"

If that's crazy, I don't want to be sane!
:silly:

[eaprez]

1. That Should Be The...

....theme of the election "how dare they....."

[Ann Arbor Dem]

17. I like that

:toast:

[boobooday]

2. I read the speech first

And then I knew I HAD to watch. C-Span was overloaded for hours, I finally got to see it -- I just wanted to see him say HOW DARE THEY!



http://www.wgoeshome.com

[Alerter_]

7. I just watched the MoveOn excerpt yesterday

I couldn't get on CSPAN either that night. Everyone was posting about it but I hadn't seen it, but when I did - wow. I really underestimated this guy.

Anyone have a link to the whole video?

[Cheswick2.0]

3. Indeed... HOW DARE THEY?

Yell it out loud!

[Alerter_]

4. Gore is the Best!

This is Gore's best speech ever, and he is 100% CORRECT about everything he said. Go Gore! Kerry/Gore 2004!

...
http://www.moveonpac.org/goreremarks052604.html

How dare they blame their misdeeds on enlisted personnel from a Reserve unit in upstate New York. President Bush owes more than one apology. On the list of those he let down are the young soldiers who are themselves apparently culpable, but who were clearly put into a moral cesspool. The perpetrators as well as the victims were both placed in their relationship to one another by the policies of George W. Bush.

How dare the incompetent and willful members of this Bush/Cheney Administration humiliate our nation and our people in the eyes of the world and in the conscience of our own people. How dare they subject us to such dishonor and disgrace. How dare they drag the good name of the United States of America through the mud of Saddam Hussein's torture prison.

:bounce: :bounce: About time somebody said it!

[dudeness]

10. oh YEAH BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:)

[Chicken George]

5. Has anybody seen this from the Boston Herald?

Rotten Bastards didn't like what President Gore had to say so I'll just post the link.

http://news.bostonherald.com/opinion/view.bg?articleid=29658

[Eric J in MN]

6. Who owns the Boston Herald? (nt)

nt

[Alerter_]

9. Boston Herald has some right-wing weird connections

I wouldn't be surprised if the Moonies were involved in some way. The Globe is a decent neo-liberal paper, but the Herald seems to be a joke.

[Tight_rope]

28. My thoughts exactly! How Dare He?

The editorial staff of the Herald is a "disgrace" to America. How dare he/she/they criticize Al Gore for stand up for what's "Right". It is because of newspapers like this one that the American people are so confused. Instead, of printing the truth, he/she/they choose(s) to print the lies of those who line his pocket with money.

As the saying goes, "MONEY TALKS BULLSHIT WALKS"! Nonetheless, the Boston Herald editorial staff is full of bullshit and should take a walk.

And next time the chicken-shit(s) should identify hisself/herself/themselves so I know who to address when I want to send a "Fuck You Letter". :beer:

[Chicken George]

11. I don't know but I fired off an email to the

SOB's reminding them that the planning to take down the WTC was hatched during Poppy's Regime and first attempted during the early days of Clinton. John Fund of all people has some like trash at WSJ Opinion Journal today too.

[ibegurpard]

15. Here we go:

http://www.fact-index.com/b/bo/boston_herald.html
"On December 20, 1982, the paper was purchased by Rupert Murdoch, who changed its name back to the Boston Herald. The Herald continued to grow over the ensuing decades, expanding its coverage and increasing its circulation.

In February 1994, Patrick Purcell, who was the publisher of the Boston Herald and a News Corporation executive, purchased the Herald from Murdoch and established it as an independent newspaper.

Today, through Herald Media, Inc., it publishes four daily newspapers, 87 weekly papers, and 21 shoppers in greater Boston and on Cape Cod."

So it's owned by a Murdoch lackey.

[Eric J in MN]

20. thanks (nt)

nt

[ibegurpard]

8. I stopped reading after the first paragraph

the stale, stinking "how come we're not outraged about Nick Berg" talking point was too much to bear.

[DaveSZ]

13. The Boston Herald calls him "Senator Flip Flop"

That really says enough about what they think of Kerry.

I don't know who owns that paper, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were Murdoch or the Moonies.

[stevedeshazer]

12. That's positively the dumbest editorial I've ever read.

And I've read a lot of dumb editorials in my time.

Thanks, Chicken George.

[Chicken George]

16. You're welcome..

I thought it was from some skinhead or kkk site. Even the NeoCON NY Post is not that bad. John Fund of all people has a hit piece on WSJ's Opinion Journal...this is pure hate from the extremist radical right wingnuts.

[ibegurpard]

18. Notice there's no byline?

Chickenshits said "editorial board staff." Whoever wrote it's too afraid to stand by it.

[Chicken George]

19. Yep...

They go on the list right atop NY Post and below Wash Times of websites to ignore on sight. Can I say f'ing bastards here..???

[ibegurpard]

21. fucking bastards!

There! :P

[Eric J in MN]

23. Editorials don't have bylines. Op-eds do.

In the NY Times, Washington Post, etc., the Editorials are by the editors, with no bylines.

The Op-eds have bylines.

[TexasBushwhacker]

27. If they don't have the balls

to put their name on it, I don't have the eyeballs to read it. There are other articles in their "Opinion" section that DO have a byline. WIMPS!

[Tight_rope]

30. That's right....too ashamed to identify themselves as idiots

They know that the public will always throw it back in their faces. Example: George W. Bush, Jr. (Better known as "THE INCOMPETENT ONE".

:beer:

[Tight_rope]

29. Your right!

Read what I said above.

[newyawker99]

25. Hi Chicken George!!

Welcome to DU!! :toast:

[Alerter_]

14. I have a confession to make

I've watched the clips of Gore's speech on MoveOn about 25 times since yesterday. His speech is like music, the cadence is catchy, and he expressed the emotions I've been feeling with the tone of his voice. Why do we allow this art of emotionally inspiring rhetoric to be left to the televangestlist scammers and right-wing nutjobs?

If Gore, Dean, and Kucinich had TV shows in the style of Pat Roberston and Jimmy Swaggart, the South would be solidly Democratic and liberal.

[eaprez]

22. NO WAY

Martin Luther King perhaps but not like Swaggart or Robertson!

[Alerter_]

24. I just mean their audience

Honestly, Jimmy Swaggart was really talented, a good musician and a great speaker, but certainly not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Robertson is just a weirdo freak.

I think the art of emotional rhetoric and public speaking needs to be revived. The only place it still exists in US society is Protestant churches. The left could fund some speakers and TV shows and make some serious inroads right in the heart of Bush's base.

[Bandit]

26. I can not wait until Al's TV Network comes into being

If this is a sample of what we are to be getting I am thrilled to death.