Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1937 Memorial Day Massacre

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:11 AM
Original message
1937 Memorial Day Massacre
I just posted the below on my Union's discussion group. *******************************************************************
The locale was Chicago, at the Republic Steel plant. The date was Memorial Day, 1937
during a demonstration against what was called "little steel". The below quote was from
the "St. Louis Post Dispatch", describing a Paramount newsreel film which was never
released.

"... Those who saw it were shocked and amazed by scenes showing scores of
uniformed police firing their revolvers pointblank into a dense crowd of men, women and
children, and then pursuing and clubbing the survivors unmercifully as they made frantic
efforts to escape.

The impression produced by those fearful scenes was heightened by the sound record which
accompanies the picture, reproducing the roar of police fire and the screams of
victims....

A vivid close-up shows the head of the parade being halted at the police line. The
flag-bearers are in front. Behind them the placards are massed. They bear such devices as
'come on Out, Help Win the Strike;' 'Republic vs the People' and 'CIO'. Between the
flag-bearers is the spokesman, a muscular young man in shirt sleeves, with a CIO button
in the band of his felt hat....

Then suddenly, without apparent warning, there is a terrific roar of pistol shots, and
men in the front ranks of the marchers go down like grass before a scythe. The camera
catches approximately a dozen falling simultaneously in a heap. The massive roar of the
pistol shots lasts perhaps two or three seconds.

Instantly the police charge on the marchers with riot sticks flying. At the same time
tear gas grenades are seen sailing into the mass of demonstrators, and clouds of gas rise
over them. Most of the crowd is now in flight....

In a manner which is appallingly businesslike, groups of policemen close in on those
isolated individuals : They go to work on them with their clubs.
In several instances, from two to four policemen are seen beating one man. One strikes
him horizontally across the face, using his club as he would wield a baseball bat.
Another crashes it down on top of his head, and still another is whipping him across the
back.

These men try to protect their heads with their arms, but it is only a matter of a second
or two until they go down. In one such scene, directly in the foreground, a policeman
gives the fallen man a final smash on the head, before moving on to the next job". .... a
girl, not more than five foot tall, who can hardly weigh more than 100 pounds ... she is
seen going down under a quick blow from a policeman's club, delivered from behind. She
gets up and staggers around. A few minutes later she is seen being shoved into a patrol
wagon, as blood cascades down her face and spreads over her clothing.

The camera catches a husky, middle-aged, bareheaded man, cornered by the police. Cut off,
he decides to run directly through them, to run the gauntlet of the flying clubs. He is
surprisingly agile as he twists and dodges. The scene is bursting with a frightful sort
of drama. Will he make it? The suspense is almost intolerable to those who watch. It
begins to look as if he will get through. But no! The police in front have turned around
now, and are waiting for him. Still trying desperately he swings to the right. He puts
his hands up, and is holding them high above his head as he runs.

It is no use. There are policemen on the right. He is cornered. He turns, still holding
high his hands. Quickly the blue-coats close in, and the night sticks fly--above his
head, from the sides and from the rear. His upraised arms fall limply under the falling
blows, and he slumps to the ground in a twisting fall, as the clubs continue to rain on
him....

Ensuing scenes are hardly less poignant. A man shot through the back is paralyzed from
the waist. Two policemen make him try to stand up, to get into a patrol wagon, but when
they let him go, his legs crumple, and he falls with his face in the dirt.... A man over
whose white shirtfront the blood is spreading perceptibly, is dragged to the side of the
road. There is plain intimation he is dying...there is continual talking, but it is
difficult to distinguish anything, with one exception--out of the babble there rises this
clear and distinct ejaculation: "God almighty!'"

Here's a good reference website: http://www.kentlaw.edu/ilhs/republic.htm

Here a quote, taken from the Union's BBS: "It takes one generation to earn it, the second
generation to benefit by it, and the third generation to squander it, and die broke"
We're somewhere between the second generation and the third generation.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. That was under FDR
Police shooting into peaceful crowds of families exercising their right to assemly and petition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, and far from the first such incident.
One of the few benefits of TV was a much more circumspect
attitude in the ruling elites about carrying out such
atrocities (in the US at least). Not unlike the tendency
of the police to refrain from public beatings because of
HandiCams; and one suspects that the new cell-phones with
cameras will further inconvenience the enforcers of the will
of the ruling class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yes, first thing Rumsfeld did was to ban cameras
shining light makes cockroaches scurry, or something like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solidarity Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thank You
Thanks for the lead post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. "That was under FDR"... what's your point?
That FDR condoned this? Why would you post this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. I hope you're not blaming it on FDR.
The early Thirties had bloody confrontations in maritime, automotive, trucking, textiles, etc. The sitdown strikes in 1936 had the potential for bloody violence, but GM read the tealeaves and backed down. Organized Labor was on a roill from that time onwards.

Corporate America got their act together the following year, and went on a carefully coordinated offensive to ROLL BACK unionism as far as possible (or defang it). The so-called Mohawk Valley Formula was the methodology, and the Memorial Day Massacre was their first concerted offensive. They're STILL at it.

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. As I watched the activities on the National Mall yesterday,
Edited on Sun May-30-04 09:38 AM by randr
with all the WWII vets etall I could only think of the treatment that the WWI soldiers recieved at the same location.
In 1930, I think, a demonstration of thousands of WWI vets showed up in Washington to demand the payment of a $60 "bonus" promised to them at the end of WWI. Congress left town and Hover called out the militia.
A charge led by MacArthur and Eisenhower attacked the men along with their families at a "shanty town" set up on or near the mall.
Reports of wagon loads of bodies were the final chapter of information about these brave men.
As I watched the event yesterday and saw how much respect my generation is displaying to our fathers, I shed a tear in how poorly they had treated their own fathers and mothers sacrifices.
"The greatest generation" my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Link to the MacArthur-Eisenhaur story?
I'd like to read about this if in fact they did this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Bonus Army
The sanitized version:

http://encarta.msn.com/media_461520891_761570424_-1_1/MacArthur_and_Eisenhower.html

In June 1932 President Herbert Hoover called General Douglas MacArthur, army chief of staff, to disperse protesting members of the Bonus Army from the nation’s capital. Hoover was sharply criticized over the incident in which MacArthur, left, shown here with his aide, Major Dwight D. Eisenhower, burned the tent encampment and used tear gas and bayonets to remove the disgruntled veterans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Here's a .pdf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Smithsonian Magazine did an article on the Bonus Army.
http://www.smithsonianmag.si.edu/smithsonian/issues03/feb03/bonus_army.html

They do discuss in that article the fact that MacArthur and Eisenhower were involved in that raid on the shanty town (along with Patton!) This cite is not the full story that appeared in the magazine, but it does have a few photos and a part of the original text:

"...What none of the participants could have foreseen was that the arrival of the Bonus Army would help shape several figures who would soon assume larger roles on the world stage—including Douglas A. MacArthur, Dwight D. Eisenhower and George S. Patton. The Bonus Army would also affect the presidential election of 1932, when the patrician governor of New York, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, squared off against incumbent President Hoover, widely blamed for the economic crisis.

By early that summer, thousands of vets were living in hastily erected shantytowns in the shadow of the Capitol. Fearful that protests would grow violent, and incited by advisers who claimed the Bonus Army numbered Communist sympathizers among its ranks, the president ordered that the vets be removed forcibly on July 28. Presiding over this day of violence was the Army Chief of Staff, Douglas MacArthur and his principal aide, Dwight Eisenhower, while the brash George Patton rode with the cavalry. With unfortunate political consequences for President Hoover, MacArthur far exceeded his authority by extending the expulsion to the veterans' camps beyond the downtown area.

Within a few days, newspapers and theater newsreels showed graphic images of the rout—fleeing vets and their families, blazing shacks, clouds of tear gas, soldiers wielding fixed bayonets. After reading accounts of the incident, Franklin Roosevelt turned to an adviser and remarked: "This will elect me..."


If you do a Google search on the term "Bonus Army" you get some amazing info, and it puts into perspective just what a long "tradition" of neglect our nation has when it comes to our veterans.

Something else that comes to mind is the story of our Militiamen sticking muskets thru the windows of Congress demanding payment of the monies due them for the Revolutionary War... Not much has changed, in that regard, I guess.

Peace to you all,


Laura

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Thanks for the links
I am sure there are more out there. I had seen the story told in a documentary aired on PBS a few years ago. It is a very reveling and tragic chapter in our nations history.
A nation that can not acknowledge its past mistakes has no hope of a future that does not repeat these same mistakes.
As we reflect on the sacrifices that have been made for our great nation we need to make a promise to ourselves that we will continue to uphold and respect these very rights that so many have died for. A clear understanding of history is required to carry our nation forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. AND the treatment that John Kerry and the Vietnam Vets received at
the same location....


there was little medical care for the wounds of Vietnam Veterans when they returned...and NO treatment for Agent Orange or Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome....

it was KERRY who led the Vietnam Vets in front of the U.S. Capital...and they were FENCED OUT of the Capital....

Nixon ordered an investigation of Kerry...and told Colson to destroy him....


John Kerry arrested with other Vietnam Veterans on May 31, 1971, at the Lexington Green.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. They used to bust heads with clubs
now they do it with their Republican majorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC