Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reagan's Regime One Of The Most Fiendish

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-04 12:00 PM
Original message
Reagan's Regime One Of The Most Fiendish
That's the title of my LTTE in The Day, an Eastern CT newspaper.
http://www.theday.com/eng/web/news/re.aspx?re=B32EB9AC-5E04-46B6-8A4B-E8D31796098F

The title doesn't match what I meant in the letter. I had said that Reagon supported one of the most fiendish regimes in the world -- South Africa's apartheid government in the 1980's, but then again Reagan's policies did hurt people in the middle and lower classes here and abroad and his Admin was fiendish to them.

With this title over my letter, I wonder how many angry Republicans will bash me in future letters, especially with my letter being published on the day of Reagan's funeral. But I stand by my letter's content.


Here's my LTTE
In his column about Ronald Reagan, Cal Thomas writes that Mr. Reagan “had seen too many people and governments that would limit human freedom to have anything but the highest regard for individual liberty as a God-given right. (“Ronald Reagan's wonderful life,” June 9.)

But history proves that Reagan championed one of the most fiendish regimes in the world, and I'm not talking about his support of Saddam Hussein.

In December 1984, Nobel Peace Prize winner Bishop Desmond Tutu, said, “...the Reagan administration's support and collaboration with (South Africa's pro-apartheid regime) is equally immoral, evil, and totally un-Christian. . . You are either for or against apartheid and not by rhetoric. . . You are either on the side of the oppressed or on the side of the oppressor. You can't be neutral.”

Mr. Reagan stubbornly refused to use the power of the United States presidency to assist the oppressed black South Africans. He preferred to use his power to try to block Congress from passing stringent sanctions on the white South African government or pass lesser sanctions than what was needed to pressure that tyrannical regime to reform.

Nelson Mandela was freed after unjustly spending nearly 30 years in prison and about a year after Mr. Reagan left office, but freedom for South African blacks wasn't won because of Mr. Reagan's “highest regard for individual liberty as a God-given right” but due to leaders like Bishop Tutu, world pressure and a pragmatic white South African leadership under Frederick Willem De Klerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC