Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ron Reagan slams Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
thebigmansentme Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 12:58 AM
Original message
Ron Reagan slams Bush
Ronald Reagan's son harshly criticized the Bush White House for invoking religion and his father's name to justify the Iraq war and scoffed, "They're no Ronald Reagans." Ron Reagan, the late President's son, unloaded on President Bush and his advisers to NBC's Chris Matthews in an interview that aired last night on "Dateline."

Reagan was asked about the ambiguous comments he made at his father's funeral, criticizing politicians who wear their faith on their sleeves. "What I find interesting about it is that everybody assumes that I must be talking about George W. Bush, which I find fascinating and somewhat telling. If the shoe fits . . .," Reagan said. "I think he's used religion to make his case for - for a lot of things, including Iraq," he said later. Reagan said he also resented White House efforts to draw parallels between Reagan and Bush.

"I would observe that my father never felt the need to wrap himself in anybody else's mantle. He never felt the need to pretend to be anybody else. . . . "This is their administration. This is their war. If they can't stand on their own two feet, well, they're no Ronald .Reagans, that's for sure," he fumed.

Reagan lashed out at Bush's refusal to expand the use of embryonic cell research. "For the federal government, for this administration, to stand in its way just to pander to people who, well-meaning as they may be, are, I think, ignorant of the facts, is just unconscionable to me," he said. "There's no downside to this. There's no real moral problem here. We're talking about cells in a petri dish, not creatures with brains and spinal cords and fingers and toes."

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/204242p-176280c.html

i think he is green, and he seemed very charismatic and articulate at the funeral. may be he run for president as a green candidate this election, so that he can steal votes from ralph nader who is stealing votes from kerry......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. again?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. I can see why freepers hate him and Clinton
Edited on Sun Jun-20-04 01:05 AM by syrinx9999
It just burns them up that all the smart guys are Democrats and they belong to the Deomcratic Party.

(or are perceived, by even the freeps, as leaning that way.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because He Has The Truth and "Charisma"
that they wish they had. Sad isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hope he blitzes the media from now to November 2
especially when they try to use Reagan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. I did not understand why they asked the pResident to speak
I understood why they asked bush I, because Reagan had previously asked him....but it would have been better to not ask Bush II especially with the stem cell part. He has trampled on them why have him do the eulogy.... sorry this may be ot but was in the end of article...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think bush just happened to be the pResident
when he died...I think the state funerals dictate the current prez speaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Clinton spoke at Nixon's...
the sitting President speaks at a former President's funeral. In this case the sitting pResident was chimp, he didn't need to be asked it was a 'given' that he was to speak. If Gore had been President (as he should have been) then he would have been the one speaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC