CrispyQ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 02:41 PM
Original message |
What does LIHOP/MIHOP mean? ...nt |
Chico Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
1. let it happen on purpose / make it happen on purpose |
Beaverhausen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
let it happen on purpose and made it happen on purpose
this relates to Bush and 9/11
am I right?
|
CO Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
LIHOP - Let It Happen On Purpose
MIHOP - Make It Happen On Purpose
Two theories concerning the Bush Administration and 9/11.
|
Racenut20
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Let it happen on purpose. made it happen on purpose |
|
ref: See Shrub reading goat book.
|
Az
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They refer to Bush Inc and their level of involvement in 9/11 |
|
LIHOP= Let It Happen On Purpose. This suggests that Bush and crew had advanced knowledge that something was coming and dropped our defenses to let it through. They may not have known what the targets were or the severity of the attack.
MIHOP= Made It Happen On Purpose. Bush and crew drew up the plans, pushed all the levers, maybe even planted charges in the buildings to make sure they came down. Complete conspiracy from top to bottom. Completely under the control of the BFEE.
|
patdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. That is a very good definition of the LIHOP/MIHOP |
|
Good for you. I am a LIHOP'er with ignorance as to the real outcome...in fact one person suggested that there was a SMALL ATTACK planed...and because the perpetrators found out they made the SMALL ATTACK into a BIG ATTACK...because those who did the BIG ATTACK knew everybody would be looking the other way in order to allow the SMALL ATTACK plan to happen????
Really with this adminstration there is no way of REALLY knowing
|
JHB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
6. LIHOP/MIHOP: how intentional was "a new Pearl Harbor"? |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 02:47 PM by JHB
Nearly all of Bush's inner circle (and their assistants) had, back in the late 1990s, publicly advocated radical, agressive action against Iraq and other MidEast countries, but they acknowledged they wouldn't be able to fully implement such a plan without what they called "something like a new Pearl Harbor."
Given such statements, their general reputation for ruthlessness and covert shenannigans, and some of the intelligence/security failures and other oddities around 9/11, some people have speculated:
LIHOP: Let It Happen On Purpose: The Bush people ignored warnings of some sort of terrorist action not simply out of colossal arrogance but in order to allow something they could use as an excuse for action (though they were likely caught off guard by the scale of the 9/11 attacks).
MIHOP: Made It Happen On Purpose: suggests a more active role, that the Bushies had a direct hand in the unfolding of events that day.
|
CrispyQ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I didn't think it possible to be anymore sickened by this administration! |
lectrobyte
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. I don't have the link too handy right now, but PNAC's website |
|
(PNAC = Project for New American Century, conservative think-tank with a lot of overlap with the current administration) used to have their documents on it, and they described their strategy with respect to a "new Pearl Harbor". I'd recommend checking it out, google should turn it up quickly. Whether you believe in LIHOP or MIHOP, understanding PNAC will help in understanding the admin's urge to get into Iraq.
|
Beaverhausen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
Bombtrack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
11. One of the main reasons this forum is somewhat of a joke and avoided |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 03:11 PM by Bombtrack
by the democratic party establishment at pretty much every level.
And they are right not to associate themselves with the particular people who rant about as yet unproven, and not even close to being proven paranoid fantasies, as if they KNOW it to be true like it's a freaking religion or something.
|
Minstrel Boy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Time to catch up on your reading, Bombtrack. |
Eloriel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-24-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. That just shows what useless fools they are |
|
Nothing more, nothing less.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |