Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any fans of Oyez.com here? (awesome Supreme Court website)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 12:41 PM
Original message
Any fans of Oyez.com here? (awesome Supreme Court website)
Edited on Sun Jun-27-04 12:45 PM by ih8thegop
It's a website all about the Supreme Court. It has info on current cases, justices, and SCOTUS history.

The justices (in order of seniority) are:

William Rehnquist, 79
John Paul Stevens, 84
Sandra Day O'Connor, 74
Antonin Scalia, 68
Anthony Kennedy, 67
David Souter, 64
Clarence Thomas, 56
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 71
Steven Breyer, 65

I'm thinking Rehnquist and/or O'Connor will retire in a few weeks, so that Bush may appoint replacements that will make him look favorable for the election, i.e. Thomas for Chief Justice. Or a former Governor of the battleground state of Missouri, whose name I refuse to mention. :scared:

But, of course, I don't think that would save Bush. If Kerry does win, I can bet for sure that Stevens will step down a year from now so Kerry will be able to appoint a new justice right away. Heck, maybe Ginsburg will step down, but I think she would wait until later in Kerry's term.

Who could replace them? Well, some people would like Clinton, Gore, Reno, or Spitzer, all fine choices. Or how about Damon Keith? Michiganders may know that Granholm was Keith's clerk for a few years.

Your thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. bush should not appoint anyone
the new sup. court term will not start until oct. He should not be able to appoint anyone because it will be a terrible one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Talk is Bush will appoint a Latino, so that he can gain
Latino support come election time since it will be the appointment of the first Latino to the Supremes. Also, if he appoints someone who is extremely controversial, it will tie up the judiciary committee and will interfere with their investigations of his admin. There was a post on this last week that referenced his possible choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC