Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SIBEL EDMONDS: Will she FINALLY not be a LONE voice in the Wilderness?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 10:09 AM
Original message
SIBEL EDMONDS: Will she FINALLY not be a LONE voice in the Wilderness?
Edited on Tue Jun-29-04 10:15 AM by LittleApple81
Ashcroft faces whistleblower secrets probe
By Shaun Waterman
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor (my note: do you notice the Homeland crap!!!! I hate that Nazi-like term)
Published 6/27/2004 10:10 PM

WASHINGTON, June 27 (UPI) -- The federal government's secrecy watchdog is conducting an inquiry into whether Attorney General John Ashcroft acted properly in classifying information relating to a lawsuit brought by a whistleblower from the FBI's translation unit.

snip...

The translation issue goes to the heart of the pre-Sept. 11 failure of the FBI and the intelligence community in general to catch the attackers and stop the plot that killed nearly 3,000 people.

Secrecy experts say the affair appears to be part of a pattern of behavior by the Bush administration: the abuse of classification procedures to stifle public debate about politically sensitive aspects of the war against terrorism.

snip...

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing June 8, Ashcroft told lawmakers that he had personally signed off the classification decision, which he justified on national-security grounds.

"If there is spilled milk and there is no damage done," he said, "if you can recollect it and put it back in the jar, you're better off than saying, 'Well, it's spilled, no damage has been done, we might as well wait until damage is done.'"

a lot more at link - Interesting (we at DU know most of this, but it is nice to see it all in one article)

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040627-030547-4386r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think we might have some hope if they don't park all her cases
with the judge who is a Bush appointee and a friend of Ashcroft. Can anybody force Ashcroft to assign the case to another judge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ashcroft assigns judges?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Somebody does. She has been emphasizing that her cases, just like
by magic, have ALL ended up at the same judge's desk. He just, literally, sits on them INDEFINITELY. Hmmmmmmmmmm......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Does anybody know how cases get assigned to judges? I am curious.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. KICK KICK KICK!!!!!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. kickety kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick and bookmark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC