Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Orrin Hatch critical of George W Bush's lack of experience....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 08:53 AM
Original message
Orrin Hatch critical of George W Bush's lack of experience....
Is Orrin psychic? E.J Dionne reminds us of what Orrin had to say about Bush Jr back in 1999. And a fabulous quote from John McCain. :)
==================================================================
<snip>
When you hear Republicans disparage Sen. John Edwards's lack of experience, remember the words of Sen. Orrin Hatch, spoken to George W. Bush at a debate on Dec. 6, 1999.

"You've been a great governor," Hatch declared of his rival for the Republican presidential nomination. "My only problem with you, governor, is that you've only had four and going into your fifth year of governorship. . . . Frankly, I really believe that you need more experience before you become president of the United States. That's why I'm thinking of you as a vice presidential candidate."

<snip>
Republicans grumbled that Edwards was Kerry's "second choice" after Republican John McCain. Can't blame the GOP for trying. But it's hard to think voters will hold it against Kerry that he tried to reach out to Republicans during a period of rancid partisanship.

Oh, yes, and one more point on that experience thing: "When it comes time to make the decision to send our young men and women into harm's way, that decision should be made by a leader who knows that such decisions have profound consequences. There comes a time when our nation's leader can no longer rely on briefing books and talking points." That was McCain in 1999. He was talking about the man who became our current president. You wonder which side will be most eager to cite that quotation.

...more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. we saw this all day in the media (about bush's lack of experience) NOT
the typical double standard...there will be no truth from now on...forget about it...just votes these assholes out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Huh?
"from now on"? We've had truth so far? Shit! Where was it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Experience should be more important at the top of the ticket...but
Edited on Wed Jul-07-04 09:00 AM by kentuck
it didn't seem to matter to the Repubs in 2000. They knew George W couldn't pick out some places on a map, but they didn't care. Now, they want to make a big deal out of inexperience of the VP candidate. Duh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejcastellanos Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Experience didn't matter with W
Just like family values didn't matter to Schwarzenegger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Please - does someone hear know - did Kerry make the offer to McCain?
What is the truth here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No. He didn't offer it to anyone until Edwards was chosen...
Of course, there was talk of McCain on the ticket, mostly to divide those two "wings" of the Republican Party. It was a very effective political ploy which Bush and Rove are trying to correct with their latest TV ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes and no
The truth is that no one officially offers unless the answer is definitely going to be 'yes', for the very reason you're hearing this as an issue today. So no, technically, Kerry didn't offer. However, it seems like it was made clear that if McCain would've said 'yes', that it would have been offered.

Personally, I don't see what the fucking difference is. Who cares if Edwards was the 50th choice? He's a good choice and he's THE choice. Isn't THAT what really matters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The difference to me is that I want to follow the lie if it is a lie and
observe how many days or months they will run the lie - it's also important that the world knows what the truth is to counter the lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I didn't mean it like that...
I wasn't trying to attack you personally by asking what difference it makes. Personally, I'm just pissed that the Rethugs are making an issue of it, because it's really quite pointless in my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Air America
Air America said that this morning as well. Hell, Bush decided on his own to run for President. In fact, he was considered a 2000 candidate back in 1996 when the media orgasmed over him and would ask if what he thought of Clinton's actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I don't believe for one minute that Bush acted on his own....the myriad
and many right wing think tanks studied this - and as was said by some caller on WJ this morning - the right wing really knows their base - white trash. They had the fundamentalist, fetus and gun lovers, furriner haters, border obsessed all in mind when they groomed the cheerleading backslapper language and life destroyer to run, after, of course, they detroyed his records and got the world to think that taking drugs and drink nearly into your 50's was OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Edwards has more foreign policy experience than Bush had
when Bush was elected. I keep bringing that up. Bush and Edwards were both in office for six years, but Edwards has the advantage of the foreign policy role that comes with a Senate seat and a spot on the foreign relations committee. It makes Edwards look better and makes people rethink how dumb it was to put Bush into office in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. And Bush was at the top of the ticket...
Edwards is only the VP...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yes, Jay Severin was saying the same about Edwards yesterday
and one of his "best and brightest" :puke: reminded him that Edwards has exactly 4 more years of national service experience than Bush* did when Bush was elected to office.

And I think if I hear one more time about how Edwards makes Kerry more electable because women will vote for the ticket because Edwards is good-looking, I may hit someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC