Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney is "pleased" about not being able to back up his assertions???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:21 AM
Original message
Cheney is "pleased" about not being able to back up his assertions???
OK, let's "do the math" on this one:

1). Cheney had no more information than commission investigators to support his later assertions to the contrary (his insistence that there were "collaborative links between Iraq and al Qaeda"

2). The vice president has asserted long-standing links between the former Iraqi president and Osama Bin Laden's Islamist militant network

3). Cheney spokesman Kevin Kellems denied any conflict between the commission's finding of no Saddam/al Qaeda relationship and the vice president's position

...and, as the result of having no evidence to back up his fabricated claims, Cheney is "pleased"...

:wtf:



Cheney Had No New Data on Saddam, Al Qaeda-Panel

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=578&e=4&u=/nm/20040707/pl_nm/iraq_cheney_dc

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Sept. 11 commission, which reported no evidence of collaborative links between Iraq and al Qaeda, said on Tuesday that Vice President Dick Cheney had no more information than commission investigators to support his later assertions to the contrary. The 10-member bipartisan panel investigating the 2001 attacks on New York and Washington said it reached its conclusion after reviewing available transcripts of Cheney's public remarks on the subject.

The vice president has asserted long-standing links between the former Iraqi president and Osama Bin Laden's Islamist militant network. "The 9-11 Commission believes it has access to the same information the vice president has seen regarding contacts between al Qaeda and Iraq prior to the 9-11 attacks," the commission said in a statement.

Cheney spokesman Kevin Kellems denied any conflict between the commission's finding of no Saddam/al Qaeda relationship and the vice president's position. He described Cheney as being "pleased" about the commission's statement and said the message "put to rest a non-story.

"As we have said all along, the administration provided the commission with unprecedented access to sensitive information so they could perform their mission," said Kellems, who noted that the commission's report was a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cheney is pleased that the 9/11 commission smacked him down?
AGAIN?

Please, please, PLEASE, dear Media- Hammer this motherfucker until he either forks over proof or recants his position.

-MR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't hold your breath
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the Kelly Gang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. scum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. OK I'm confused
Cheney is pleased about the 9/11 commission standing by its story about no link between Al Qaeda and Hussein? I thought the most telling line in the above article was the line about a "non-story". That indicates that they just want this to go away and will try to quash it if any reporters continue to pursue it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. How long will it take for the bruises on my forehead to heal?
This is so wrong in so many ways and on so many levels i feel like banging my head on the desk.

The unspeakable arrogance of the man -- "So I lied. My lie got more airtime than this rebuttal, so I won. Oh yeah, and go fuck yourself."

WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Cheney is the bully; he can get away with anything because a majority
is scared shitless of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nixonwasbetterthanW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Richard Nixon, circa early August '74:

"I am pleased that the tapes show -- just as I have ever contended -- that I tried to obstruct an investigation into the break-in ... now let's put to rest this non-story."

In other news, Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Cheney/ his admirers are retarded
I just heard on cable the other day that during a recent stump speech Cheney's idiot fans started to applaud him... at which point Cheney in a disgusted fashion interupted and said "Do you want to hear this or not?"

The man's arogance and stupidity is astounding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Give em hell Dick!
I think some repukes view cheney as their version of Harry Truman. Too bad facts don't matter to those that are blinded by their hatred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sounds to me that everyone decided to drop it
What would Cheney's publice statements tell them about what he does or doesn't know?

I think Cheney didn't respond because that would keep the story alive.

I have to say I just love how they state this "the administration provided the commission with unprecedented access to sensitive information so they could perform their mission,"

Unprecedented-\Un*prec"e*dent*ed\, a. Having no precedent or example; not preceded by a like case; not having the authority of prior example; novel; new; unexampled. -- Un*prec\"e*dent*ed*ly, adv.

That is not necessarily GOOD unprecendented-I read it as no one has ever so openly and blatantly refused to turn over information in the ways or scale they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. Does this mean he'sll STFU now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bacchant Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Although you'd figure this finally closes that door
how much you wanna bet they continue to elude to the "connections" during the campaign and debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. Put that picture of Cheney together
with the one of Bush posted this morning by Bush_Eats_Beef and you have two extremely frightened people. What exactly are they seeing there behind those eyes of panic?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC