Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is it that when GIs take someone by force from their home it is called

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:35 AM
Original message
Why is it that when GIs take someone by force from their home it is called
an arrest but when the Iraqis take a GI it is called a kidnapping? :shrug: Just another way to cleanse what we do compared to them doing the same thing. They commit a crime and we liberate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. exactly
they are insurgents but when we went up against england in 1776 it was a revolution.....

they use words ....calling people the enemy is objectifying them... so they don't have to think they are ordinary people...

they break in their houses and steal their stuff...

like the usa shipping all iraq heirlooms out of the country....like Germany did as it spread across europe....
this is really bad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, that's why the US soldiers are heros
for bombing a house in Fallujah, but when an Iraqi bombs a house in Bhagdad, he's an evil-doer/terrist/deadender/foriegner/Al-Kiter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. relativity
depends upon where one stands.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Because one acts with the authority of a state while the other does not.
In other words, they have a stamp of approval from a bunch of very wealthy aristocrats.

It's the same thing that makes one man an "insurgent" and the other a "soldier". Or one man a "terrorist" and the other a "commando".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Language matters.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC