Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jack Ryan talking to Hannity last night. New take?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:35 PM
Original message
Jack Ryan talking to Hannity last night. New take?
Okay, okay, I know what y'all will tell me about watching InsHannity, but this particular show was like a train wreck; when I saw it channel surfing, I had to stop and watch.

Most DUers would agree that Ryan is a hypocrite because of his and his party's "family values" platform and his own frequenting of sex clubs with his then-wife.

But, Ryan went even further into the realm of
"I can't fucking believe he just said that" by stating HIS scandal was unfair because it was the first sex scandal involving a politician in which there was no sex! He further stated that he "broke no promises or marriage vows" by visiting these clubs with his wife!!! Oh, and of course, the Clenis featured prominently in the discussion, since good ol' Jack could NEVER be as bad as Clinton. Feh!

Okay, correct me if I'm wrong, but don't most of the hard-core fundies that support the Rethugs regard even THINKING about things such as sex clubs as akin to infidelity? Surely, this scandal wouldn't win Jack any votes at the local Baptist church?

Ryan and Hannity's attitudes transcended mere hypocrisy or ass-covering last night. I truly believe the right-wing's beliefs amount to nothing more than a sophisticated version of FYBIGM (Fuck You Buddy, I've Got Mine).

I'd truly not care about any of Ryan's private antics if he were'nt a member of the party denying marriage rights to same-sex couples, and decrying women who become unwed mothers by choice. But the fact is, Jack Ryan may want understanding because he "didn't break any promises or marriage vows", but would this Jackhole or any of his supporters be as understanding about gay couples adopting children, or of voluntary polyamorous arrangements?? I doubt it.

In conclusion, FUCK jack Ryan, FUCK Hannity, and FUCK these "family values" hypocrites!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right, I agree...
What Ryan does in his private life is no elses business, and what he did with his wife wasn't all bad in my opinion. Just those that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. You're not getting it
SHE DIDN'T WANT TO DO THESE THINGS WITH HIM IN PUBLIC. Are we on the same page now? This is what makes him a scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. OK....
I agree she didn't want to do these things, and yes he is a scumbag. But was there any violence involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Oh my GOD!!
Edited on Wed Jul-07-04 02:14 PM by Scairp
So, it's okay for him to attempt to bully and intimidate her into participating in deviant sexual activities that she doesn't want to do, as long as he didn't beat her? WHAT planet are you from? He used her love for him to manipulate her into doing these things that, let's say it again, SHE DIDN'T WANT TO DO IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Why did she do them then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. She didn't, instead
she divorced him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Thank you
She says she refused to have sex with him in front of another couple at one of these clubs, but did perform a sex act on him at his insistence. I think there's one part where she said she was crying but I can't recall if it was this episode or something else. The bottom line is, she had no interest in doing these activities, going to s&m clubs, or having sex in front of others. These were his fantasies,not hers. Any loving, caring husband wouldn't have put his wife in such an uncomfortable position and continued to force the issue as he clearly did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. These things are grounds for divorce...
And shows he is a scumbag. But these things can hardly be considered illegal. That's all I am saying.... Do you think he broke any laws?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. No one is saying he broke any laws. HE says he broke no vows.
She disagreed. That's the rub.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I can agree with that...EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. I give up
This isn't about laws being broken, it's about another right wing pol beating the morality drum, and really being nothing more than a sex-obsessed slime. He's a hypocrite, just like so many other self-righteous repigs who are exposed for being the lowlifes that they are. THAT'S the point, not whether any actual laws were broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I agree. Don't place yourself up as a paragon of virtue if you...
...can't live up to the standard most are going to judge you by.

Most conservative married types would probably say that going out to engage in sex acts with others is kinda sleazy and not "traditional values".

Trying to coerce your wife into participating after she puts her foot down on the issue is that much more sleazy.

Personally, if two people want to have an open marriage or engage in sadomasochism or bondage and discipline or voyeurism, I see nothing wrong with that.

On the other hand, if it set yourself as running on a campaign of traditional Christian values, you best be prepared for the fallout if word gets out about your liking kink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Whoaaaa...
Relax Scairp. I am on your side sheeeesh..... I agree with what you said...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. I used to work at a hotel
Every year a group of rich guys organized some kid of event that always turned into a swingers/orgy fest. I don't remember what the plan was, but every year the elevators would keep getting stopped, people would sneak into maintenance closets, or try fooling around in the lobby bathrooms. We had extra security for this event, and they had to break up all kinds of shenanigans that other guests complained about.

One time they had to break up a fight were some rich guy was trying to get his wife to swap with another couple. She didn't want to, and she was in tears. She kept asking her husband why he would do this, why he wanted her to, all the while sobbing, but he kept pushing her, until he started yelling at her, and the cops had to get involved.

You could tell what she was thinking. She had married a man she was in love with, and felt the sex was part of that love, but this man was bullying her into something she thought was adultery. To her, sex meant something special, to him it was casual. I'll never forget the way she cried, as though her heart had broken, as though the man she had married turned into someone else.

Ryan's a scum. Not because of what he wanted to do, but because of how he treated the woman who agreed to marry him. Who probably loved him. She was just a play toy to be used, and he didn't care how he hurt her, as long as she gave him what he wanted.

That is EXACTLY the kind of thing we should know about someone we send to Washington to represent us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. yea he was on Scarborough too
and the unsaid truth of the matter is/was he was getting slaughtered in the polls before he made his customary republican copout announcement to spend more time with his family bullshit.Hey anybody else notice how much Ryan looks like David Brock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. OOPS!! Sorry, it was Scarborough and not Hannity!
I get the two of them confused sometimes. Not like you could tell them apart by what's coming out of their mouths, anyway.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Scarborough is the Family Vaues Poster Boy for Murder
He is the White OJ and I have no doubt h e did a great job at helping ol' Jack Ryan cover his crooked ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. I saw the jerk on Scarbrough, too,
and couldn't believe the blatant hypocrisy. The two were nodding in agreement that Ryan had been treated unfairly and persecuted for nothing more than wanting to have sex with his wife.

If Ryan had a "D" after his name, "family values" Scarborough would have been foaming and frothing at the mouth about how sordid the story is and how generally perverted Dems are.

But Former Congressmen Dead Staffer becomes indignant when some asshole repuke gets caught with his pants down. The two were a sick, sorry sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Party Platform
"FYBIGM (Fuck You Buddy, I've Got Mine)."

Isn't that the Republican Party Platform? Maybe Cheney was just the first one out of the chute with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe he should have used that defense first, rather than denying
that there was any truth to her claims.

The problem that Jack has missed is that HE wanted to do these things, and obviously SHE did not, which makes it seem rather illicit. Also, he lied about it, so obviously HE thought there was something wrong with what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. To a GOPig, only illicit sex is good sex.
So, OF COURSE Jackie would want to go to these clubs. Funny, though, to most of the regulars at these places, it's not illicit, just a form of recreation. And folks like Ryan stick out like sore, ah, erm, thumbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey, just like Henry Hyde said, this is about LYING, not sex.
Welcome to the world that you helped to create, Mr. Ryan.

This is a GOP problem, Mr. Ryan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is the REAL problem with Ryan
He tried to FORCE his wife into going to these places and fulfilling his perverted (MY opinion) fantasies. She didn't want to do it. I still think he's a hypocrite, whether he cheated on his wife or not. He treated her very poorly in these situations and I don't find anything he says about being faithful to his wife the least bit compelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Agreed. Also,
When she cried in one place because she hated it he said,"You know, crying isn't a turn-on".

Couldn't care less if both parties are into partying, care greatly if one is coerced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. I am more bothered by his disregard for her feelings
I couldn't care less about how kinky he is. But the allegations are that he tried to get her to go to the clubs even after she made it clear that they made her uncomfortable. That is what the issue should really be about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. 53% of the american population is women and the motherfucker abuses them
that's the real scandal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. Throw their words right back in their face.."It's all about Character"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DNCnotDLC Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why Ryan's point is so stupid
If it wasn't so scandalous, why did the voters all reject him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Hi DNCnotDLC!
Welcome to DU!

:hi:

Love your nick, btw... :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. "If you did nothing wrong, Jack, why did you drop out of the race?"
Edited on Wed Jul-07-04 01:53 PM by arbusto_baboso
THIS is what we should be asking right now. It's what the 'Pukes would be blasting all over their echo chamber if it had happened to a Dem.

Slimy, woman-hating, two-faced, rat-bastard, gutless admixtures of baboon snot and goose shit!!

Oh, and BTW, did I say FUCK you RYAN?!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cjbuchanan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. What gets me is that it was the GOP that did him in
It was not the Dems. Obama stayed the hell away from all this, as did most other Dems.

The repugs are the ones who gave him the boot. The repugs were the ones talking about this, yet they act like the Dems raised a stink. Just more dumb behavior from their side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. The Republicans pressured Ryan to drop out because of sinking poll numbers
So where is the unfairness? There were no special prosecutors hounding him. If he felt there was no scandal, why didn't he stay in the race and take his licking at the polls like a man? Weenie Whiner! or Whining Weener. Take your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. Unless they changed the wedding vows most people take....
He's a goddamned liar.

"Will you love her, comfort her, honor and keep her, in sickness and in health, and forsaking all others, be faithful to her as long as you both shall live?"

Trying to coerce your wife into having sex in a sex club kinda falls short on "Honor" and "forsaking all others" part of the standard marriage vows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I would disagree.....
>Trying to coerce your wife into having sex in a sex club kinda falls short on "Honor" and "forsaking all others" part of the standard marriage vows.

These things are based on mutual consent. The problem came when he wanted to and she didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Isn't that kinda the definition of coercion?
In things like that, a single partner has veto power. He wanted to do these things, she didn't. He kept trying to convince her after she put her foot down on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunDrop23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. Hannity got beat down last night
Jack Kemp and Ralph Nader both slapped him around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. C'mon Ryan, get back in the race.
Dems never wanted you out...WE LOVE YOU! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. Similar story
When I was Mayor of a small town, we had a pseudo-Chippendale's Troupe coming into town for a "One-Night-Only Ladies Night". The local newspaper and church groups went nuts.... The guy who wrote the most aggressive LTTE came to my office to demand that I outlaw the troupe. He actually said to me: "You know, it's not like me or you going to a strip club, that's natural, it's like Ma and Pa Sex, but this is different."

The hypocrisy has never changed.

Just an aside:

The troupe did come to town and they did their performance. The Chair-person of my Library Board had to be removed because she got carried away.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
39. The real issue isn't sex clubs.
The real issue isn't sex clubs.

It's that Jack Ryan was so obnoxious to Jeri Ryan, not only at the sex clubs but at home, that she left him.

Yet his website says how much he cares about the traditional family.

"As an elected leader, my interest will be in promoting laws and educating people about the fundamental importance of the traditional family unit as the nucleus of our society."

For more information and PHOTOS of Jeri Ryan, vistit MOVELEFT.COM:

http://www.moveleft.com/moveleft_essay_2004_06_26_jack_ryan_family_values_hypocrite.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. Naw, Hannity just wanted the address of the sex club
and to get Ryan to talk about trying to convince 7 of 9 to blow him in public. Seany-Boy had a woody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC