Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't think the "Willie Horton" style ad would be too effective anymore.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 01:10 AM
Original message
I don't think the "Willie Horton" style ad would be too effective anymore.
Remember? That is the ad that Dukakis was blind-sided with back in the day. His numbers started dropping after that.

I think the electorate is more jaded now that we've had years of that same negative crap for political ads--I think it would backfire maybe if Bush tried it on Kerry/Edwards.

I remember it as being the first really low-blow negative BS ad. And at the time, it was effective against Dukakis.

Don't think such an ad would still work in the same way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how effective it really was. I suspect it repelled as many votes
as it attracted.

I think the ad that really sunk Dukakis was the tank ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. it was Dukakis' response to the question of what if his wife was raped
or murdered and whether he would support the death penalty. he opposed the death penalty and had been asked this question many times so he gave the same answer he always gives but people didn't think he was emotional enough about it. and this is where the willie horton ad was effective, dukakis' answer got people to see the willie horton ad of being soft on crime as true rather than just a negative ad commonly used in politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ugh. I had forgotten about the hypothetical rape question.
God, that was disgusting--the question, not the answer. The press helped screw over Dukakis as much as anything (same with Al Gore too).

Hope that Kerry/Edwards can effectively counter anything that comes at them like this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Dukakis is a decent guy, but a political wet noodle
He just couldn't take on the Atwater machine. I hate to say it, but Dukakis was a wimp. I had a hard time admitting I voted for him.

Kerry, on the other hand, is no Dukakis. He's been hardened by a few decades in politics, and has seen it all. He is quick at the comebacks (i.e. the Cheney is already president quip, which sounded like he had just logged off DU). Kerry ain't takin' no shit this year. He is not the Massachusettes liberal that the GOP is trying to paint him as.

But I hope they still hold low expectations for Kerry. It'll shock 'em even more when he topples Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Wally Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. yeah, the tank
He looked like a bug in the tanker helmet. Shoulda wore a baseball cap and put the head set over his hat. Course that was a photo-op set up by his own people to make him look strong on defense. They should have had him standing in the turret looking like Rommel or Patton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. It Doesn't Matter What It Is
They just latch on to something, *anything*,
and hammer on it with their bottomless advertising budget
until people react the way they want. It always works on
a significant portion of the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not even with an Arab Willie Horton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. It would do the Democrats a world of good to preempt the strategy
Their stewardship of the economy is a failure; there is a lower percentage of employed Americans in the summer of an election year than on the previous inauguration day for the first time since 1932.
Their war on terror is a failure; since Iraq had nothing to do either the September 11 attacks or al Qaida and had nothing remotely resembling the kind of weapons arsenal the Bushies claimed they had, how could invading that country make Americans safer? During the time the real war on terrorism was neglected in order to topple Saddam, al Qaida regrouped and has in the last several months staged significant attacks in Istanbul, Madrid and Riyadh.

They are a bunch of crooks. The invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism, but it has produced significant business opportunities for Bush's favorite transnational corporate campaign contributors, including those in which administration officials or their families have obvious connections, such as Carlyle and Halliburton. Since the streets are still not safe nor electrical power reliable Iraq, one should ask what these transnational are doing to earn the US taxpayer money they are receiving. This is in addition to one corporate scandal after another. They wink while Enron and other energy giants steal from California rate payers; they don't react to Enron stealing from its own employees like its any big deal.

The Bushies have nothing to say for themselves. They outdo even the Harding administration for corruption and incompetence and even the Nixon administration for arrogance and cynicism. They must convince us that John Edwards, Mr. Carolina Sunshine himself, is a pessimist, that Kerry's supporters are a bunch of wild-eyed loonies and that Osama wants Kerry to win.

We can expect a plethora of Willie Horton ads. The best thing to do is to say that there will be a plethora of negativism from the Bushies before they strike.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC