Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Outraged judge acquits gay HS principal, blasts prosecution and police

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 06:56 AM
Original message
Outraged judge acquits gay HS principal, blasts prosecution and police
Edited on Thu Jul-08-04 07:05 AM by Padraig18
Outraged judge acquits gay HS principal, blasts prosecution and police

Douglas County Republican
Arcola, IL
July 8th, 2004

CHARLESTON--- At the close of a two-day bench trial, a Coles County circuit judge acquitted former Mattoon High School principal Edward Kilday of all charges relating to an alleged 2001 sexual assault on a then 16 year-old male student at the school. In his ruling, Judge Gary Jacobs fired verbal salvos at both the police and states' attorney.

"This is a case that should never have seen the light of day within our court system", Jacobs said. "The only credible evidence presented here at trial proved that Dr. Kilday was an upstanding, caring and respected educator who happens to be gay, neither of which is a crime in Illinois", Jacobs said.

Kilday, 49 of LaSalle, was charged in May 2003 with two counts of official misconduct, one count of aggravated sexual battery on a child and one count of obstruction of justice. He plead guilty last month to the misdemeanor misconduct charge, admitting he had used the computer in his office to visit pornographic websites. At that time, he dropped his demand for a jury trial, opting instead for a trial before a judge.

In finding Kilday not guilty on all the remaining charges, Jacobs took sharp exception to the police and prosecution's handling of the case. "Because of the critical importance we as a society rightly place upon the protection of our children, allegations of this nature must be taken seriously, but both the States' Attorney's office and the Mattoon police department failed miserably in their duty to properly investigate these allegations; it never occurred to any of you at any point that the defendant might not be guilty, or that the victim might be lying", Jacobs said. "Your own witnesses swore under oath that the victim was, at best, not credible and at worst, a pathological liar. He himself admitted that he gave four different versions of the alleged assault to the police, not one of which was in any way consistent with any of the other three".

"In his 27 years as a teacher and administrator, Dr. Kilday has achieved a reputation as kind, dedicated and respected educator who has time and again been recognized as outstanding by both his peers and students, and the violence you have done to his life and his character can only be described as extreme, and your actions as grossly negligent and reckless. I can only hope that this court's verdict will, in some small measure, begin to repair the damage you have done".

Had he been convicted on the most serious charges against him, Kilday would have received a mandatory minimum prison sentence of six to twenty-five years, a sentence that could have been extended to as long as seventy-five years.

When asked to comment on the judge's ruling, Kilday's attorney said "We are elated. Ed has steadfastly maintained his innocence, and he cooperated fully with the police in this investigation. Judge Jacobs saw this case for what it was--- a witch hunt. The police department saw this as case as 'he's gay, so he's guilty' from day one and ignored any evidence of Ed's innocence, including the three lie-detector examinations he passed conclusively". Both the States Attorney's office and the Mattoon police declined to comment, due to the 'possibility of pending litigation'.


Note to Moderators: The newspaper is not available online, and I have verbal permission from the publisher to use this material. Any typographical errors are mine.

---Padraig18
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. this
Edited on Thu Jul-08-04 07:04 AM by Scooter24
is great news...

I hope his job isn't ruined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. His job was ruined the day his arrest hit Front Page.
I'll bet every sordid detail of it all was splashed across the front page of the Mattoon paper.

Now that he's been acquitted, that news will be on page 7 of the sports section, tucked between the NYSE table and the personal classifieds...

"Possible litigation"? isn't that like a "possible sunrise"?

I hope he OWNS the Mattoon PD when this is over!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Don't administrators have a "responsibility" to screen material

A short admission of "I viewed a pornographic website on my computer" doesn't even prove misconduct. A principal may have a responsibility to "scan" media sources to determine the extent of the internet porn issue. In fact, he could be negligent if he doesn't since his schools computers are connected to the internet.

One simple possibility is that a student may have been accused of browsing a porn site on a school computer. At that point, the principal would have a responsibility to review the material in question to determine the level of the students offense. Obviously, soft-core T&A would merit a less serious offense than Bang Bus ;-)

Though, I will say that one generally shouldn't be "using" porn at the office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you for this story
And thank you Jacobs for your rebuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Judge Jacobs is a conservative Republican
He has a reputation as a 'hanging judge' locally, but he is also a stickler for 'proof of guily beyond a reasonable doubt and to a mroal certainty'. If I were ever charged with a crime I had no committed, I'd want a bench trial in his court.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. That is a pretty good general rule of thumb on most cases
If you are innocent, ask for a bench trial. If you're guilty, ask for a jury trial. Most judges are sticklers for guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and are less easily swayed by emotional appeals, etc. Juries can be played like a violin, and both defense and prosecuting attornies know it. Just look at the fine art that jury selection has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Padraig, I think you should post this in the Illinois forum. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'll ask for permission.
Edited on Thu Jul-08-04 07:06 AM by Padraig18
Don't want to violate the 'dupe' or 'SPAM' rules.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hope he sues the shit out of the DA's office and the Sheriff's dept. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm pretty sure he will.
The law firm that represented him in this case is also a 'big time' personal-injury firm; I don't think it's a coincidence he chose them to represent him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I certainly hope he sues the heck out of them....you have to think that...
...his career as an educator has been totally trashed thanks to the local law enforcement and State's Attorney's office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I agree.
I'm a gay man, and if I were in his shoes, I'd sue everyone onvolved who couldn't outrun the process erver!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. But but but trial lawyers are eeeeeveeeel! FOX News told me so! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Faux News, you say?
"We think, so you don't have to."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. What firm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Tulin & Associates. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is every gay teacher's worst nightmare
if you replace the aquittal with a conviction. This is why I am so adament about defendents not being presumed guilty. This teacher was very lucky to have a judge who both knew and obeyed the law. I hope he can find another job but I highly doubt it. The porno thing may have been enough by itself in this day and age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Sadly, I suspect he'll never teach again.
He was extremely fortunate to have been in front of an honest judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. I would never go to a jury with a case like that
I know all to well what enough people think if gays. I hope he is able to pick up the pieces. That accuser should be in jail for as long as the guy would have been in jail had he been convicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wow a Real Live Judge in Imperial Amerika! Will wonders never cease!
He is likely marked to be replaced with a Bushevik Federalist "Nazi Judge".

In 20 years this same case coming before this same court will result in 25 years for that Librul, and innocence nor guilt will have little to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. What's weird is that the judge is a Republican.
He's not, however, one of the fundy types, just an old-fashioned, Eisenhower-admiring 'Chamber of Commerce' Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I have no problem with True Conservatives, even if I disagree with them
I would trust in the integrity of a True Conservative about 10000X more than a Bushevik.

This incident once again confirms my view on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. True enough
I just have a feeling that, come November, we may find out we have friends we weren't aware that we had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taylor Mason Powell Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ah, I love the smell of PUNITIVE DAMAGES in the morning...

Not for nothing did the judge explicitly mention "GROSSLY NEGLIGENT" in his decision...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. 'possibility of pending litigation'
too bad the states' attorney's office and the police didn't think about that before the judge's rebuke. i'm sure they had plenty to say before his ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC