Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military vote at risk; post F9/11 impact?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lil-petunia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 08:34 AM
Original message
Military vote at risk; post F9/11 impact?
Typically, the military votes republican/consevative at a higher rate than the general population. If there is a war on, that is magnified. But, maybe not this time.

We have almost 400,000 troop posted outside the US borders or on ships at sea. But despite major voting debacles in 2000 and 2002, the US military and US govt have only now (in the last two months) tried to "fix" the way in which ballots are handed out, how Diabold computer voting machines will be analyzed and configured and how the votes will be counted on Nov. 2. Estimates and guestimates range from 20-45% of presidential ballots had a problem from overseas in 2000. Want to venture a guess about 2004?

No one knows if the Diabold machines will work. No dry runs, no tests, but still the president of Diabold "KNOWS" and "GUARANTEES" that Bush will be re-elected.

Despite GAO reports that these machines are easily tampered with, Diabold deliberately does not allow for paper tracks (needed for auditing and confirmation).

Add to this mess, many troop are angry at how they are being treated. Being able to see F9/11 will only reinforce this change in beliefs and voting patterns. Troops stationed in the US are flocking to the movie. Reports are scattered, but the reactions are apparently grim. Angry and grim.

I don't know about you folks, but I smell a rat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not usually a tin foil hat type
because a major conspiracy usually someone talks.. but I keep wondering..

why is it illegal to have a paper trail?

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC