Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What impact would moving all class action cases to the Feds have?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 08:39 AM
Original message
What impact would moving all class action cases to the Feds have?
I'm listening to c-span and they have reps from both sides of the argument on. I guess I don't understand who's good and who's bad on this one.

One of them said most class action cases are in Fed. Court already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lil-petunia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. except in
mizzo, Illinois, georgia, texas and a few other states.

Moving it to federal court would clean up the jury pool tremendously, it would keep the good cases alive, and flush out the admittedly bad ones that ruin it for the rest of the legal system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bad move
I am against trying any case in Federal Court in the 8th Circuit. I am a lawyer and BushCo has packed the federal bench with right-wing youngsters who will be around forever. Federal Court used to be the place to protect freedoms, now it is a place to protect corporations.

I heard at a conference that only 2% of civil rights/employment cases are ever successful in the 8th Cir.

Very disheartening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lil-petunia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. the 7th Circuit
has neonazis on board, too. Posner has created the largest roadblocks to employment litigation imaginable.

His taxing decisions are the worst. not only do his opinions require taxation of the entire award to the plaintiff, but the plaintiff has to pay taxes on contigent atty. fees, AND then, the attorney is taxed on the fees he/she earned! I think that the 8th adopted Posner's logic in some of this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC