Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

self-made millionaire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:19 PM
Original message
self-made millionaire
I heard Edwards described on the bbc as a "self-made millionaire." Some of the American news media have used that phrase to describe Edwards, but I think more often than not they feature the right wing talking point that as a millionaire Edwards does not credibly represent the working people he champions.

Is it only rightwing conservatives who have given up on the glamour of the personal success story, the rags-to-riches tale so emblematic of the opportunity that exists in America? Or has the popular culture grown tired of self-made millionaires? Or maybe the Republicans in for a rude awakening come November?

If it was up to me, I'd take a self-made man over the fortunate son of a political dynasty any day of the week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush has failed his way to the top. He even lost his way into White House.
What kind of lesson is that for Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. lol --lost his way into the White House
I don't see why they would want to talk about Edwards' career at all--unless they think by doing so we won't notice Bush's distinguished record of failure.

What an absurdity. Eesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. This was what my Republican father always idolized, the
man who rose from dire circumstances and made something of himself. (women need not apply). It was a path he himself followed and he did very well for himself. I know my Arkansas native father would have approved of Edwards, if he were a Republican.

Too bad a Democrat doesn't get the same approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. too sad
It just boggles the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddem43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. He certainly can represent working people, as he has in -
his law practice. The only way he couldn't is if he forgot where he came from. That isn't likely at this point. The right wing continues to discredit and deny the very thing that they claim to be in favor of - the right for anyone to make a ton of money. Amazingly, they see no irony in that. I guess it would be better if he made his money in some stock swindle or by cheating little old ladies out of their life savings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But then he'd be a Republican...
Yep, I'm very content with the choice Kerry made...although I was rooting for Clark. I still think Clark is a good man and worth his salt to be in Kerry's cabinet. We shall see if Kerry thinks so too..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Didn't you know by now that rethugs have different rules for themselves?
Edited on Thu Jul-08-04 10:53 PM by demo@midlife
The right wing continues to discredit and deny the very thing that they claim to be in favor of...

They certainly don't deny themselves (OR their cronies) the ability to make a ton of money!

Amazingly, they see no irony in that...

But that would be expecting way too much, wouldn't it? I don't think many RWers are able to be reflective, self-critical, or detect irony. In other words, to be objective.

Another irony is that in trying to portray Democrats as being hypocritical in having two people on the ticket with some wealth betrays their own hypocrisy (for reasons you mentioned).

I guess it would be better if he made his money in some stock swindle or by cheating little old ladies out of their life savings.

LOL! Seems like that stuff is OK if rethugs are guilty of it - as long as they get rich in the process. But let the Clintons have a business deal gone wrong (Whitewater) years ago? They're worthy of millions of $ worth of investigation and pretty much considered guilty until proven innocent. (Perhaps if they'd made out like bandits from Whitewater they would've been worthy of praise. Oh well, except that they're Democrats.)

(Edited for grammar)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddem43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep, we agree completely! - It is interesting that
none of them are beating up poor old Ken Lay. I am sure when this is all over, and after Bush pardons him, he will be down to his last hundred million or two, and they will treat him as the victim of the mean and vindictive left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Ken Lay as victim of the mean and vindictive left
Methinks it's already started.

My, but that #*@Cheney#@ Grandma Millie sure is a mean one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC