Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV: EAC head does not want election monitoring

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:03 AM
Original message
BBV: EAC head does not want election monitoring
Edited on Fri Jul-09-04 08:24 AM by God_bush_n_cheney
Thirteen members of the U.S. House of Representatives asked the United Nations on Thursday to do something in the United States that the international body usually does only in fledgling or war-ravaged countries: monitor its presidential elections.

The House members, who included Oakland Democrat Barbara Lee, are the latest to jump on an onrushing bandwagon to monitor the Nov. 2 election. Dozens of consumer, voter and human rights organizations, including some in the Bay Area, are drawing up plans to camp out at polling places, bird-dog new voting technology, have lawyers on-call for election day questions and scan registration lists to avoid "another Florida 2000," as their collective mantra goes.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/07/09/BAGBC7I14712.DTL



IMHO Deforest Soaries has to go here is his statement in the article....

"While he supports concerns about how smoothly the voting process will work, Soaries is uneasy about the prospect of a lot of monitors showing up at polls on election day.

"Between the exit pollsters, the advocates and now, the monitors, you could have to wade through 50 people to get to the polls," Soaries said. "I just hope that some people don't find that too intimidating."

DeForest...it is our vote...we will monitor it if we want to!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BevHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have the following concerns about Soaries:
1) His group, the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), set up under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) to set guidelines for elections, has brought in the very people who have caused a meltdown in confidence in the system.

We have a small group of officials -- who, Andy and I are finding, as we take the pulse of America -- do NOT represent all election officials. This small group caused the U.S. to make a mad rush towards unrecountable, unauditable touch screen voting. They include a handful of state election directors, vendor-friendly state examiners, and a few secretaries of state. After making a total fiasco of procurement of new voting machines without having either the standards or the checks and balances in place, costing the taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, these same officials have now been placed on the EAC boards.

Ireland had it right. They dumped their touch screens and fired the minister who purchased them, saying they could have spent that 40 million euros on a badly needed social program.

Here in the U.S., we rewarded these officials for their flawed judgement by giving them positions with the newly formed EAC. There are other officials we could have chosen. Responsible ones. We didn't. Where is Soaries' voice on this?

2. Soaries then launched the rather horrifying trial balloon suggesting we get guidelines for postponing or CANCELLING elections due to terrorism, a theme now repeated by Tom Ridge and George W. Bush.

3. Now Soaries is saying he's uncomfortable with having election monitors.

RULE OF THUMB FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK: When someone doesn't want you to look at something, look at that thing especially carefully.

I think this applies to the whole country this year. I've been called a "terrorist" by San Bernardino County (CA) county registrar Scott Konopasek, for our plans to install election watchers. He said he'd "throw 'em out" if he found them. Now we've got the head of the EAC saying he doesn't like the idea of monitors.

Therefore, we should get even more monitors.

Black Box Voting monitors will be doing a variety of things -- from volunteering as poll workers and election judges to watching the numbers roll in and comparing them with audit data to observing the central count. To volunteer, email Bevharrismail@aol.com -- it may be a couple weeks before you are contacted, as we start kicking this program into high gear late this month.

Bev Harris
Executive Director
Black Box Voting

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You're hitting it right on the head, Bev. Keep up the good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. RE: "I just hope that some people don't find that too intimidating."
I'd think no more intimidating than the police road blocks and police intimidating people at the polling sites in Florida last time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes
and we will not be wearing SWAT gear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Figures....
Monitoring the election will make it hard for the regime to steal four more years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BevHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Soaries is also trying to portray election monitoring as "partisan"
in response to statements from organizations that the election monitoring will be scrupulously nonpartisan, he "disagreed," saying that political reform happens when people want a particular candidate to win.

No way. This is a nonpartisan issue. And this guy is showing his true colors.

Bev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes...notice the yellow stripe
down his back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC