Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Good Has Cheney's Experience Been So Far?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:19 AM
Original message
What Good Has Cheney's Experience Been So Far?
Edited on Fri Jul-09-04 08:23 AM by louis c
The repukes have been so quick to try to tout Dick Cheney's experience as an international player, former Defense Secretary, and Presidential adviser. Let's see how he's done so far.

Certainly Cheney's "vast experience" was no help in preventing 9/11. He was unaware or incapable of advising President Bush of co-ordinated action following a whole host of warnings of the upcoming threat from various Intel sources, including the now famous August 6, 2001 PDB.

V.P. Cheney didn't use his "vast experience" in being able to inform the President that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. In fact the evidence is that he may have used this false security blanket to actually mis-inform the Chimp. Either that or they were in on it together.

At the same time, he was supporting the Intel coming from Chalabi, that ended up being false. In fact, this "experienced" diplomat, Dick Cheney, protected us so much, Ahmed Chalabi sat right next to Laura Bush at the President's State of the Union address, while Chalabi was funneling secrets to our enemies in Iran.

Cheney's long years in diplomatic circles failed to convince the U.N., NATO, or even a single Muslim nation to support our invasion in Iraq. We went in essentially alone, except for Blair's England.

When the war in Iraq was decided, our "experienced" V.P., Dick Cheney, convinced the President to take Rumsfeld's advice, against that of career military personal, like General Zinni. We went in with too few troops to secure that country. As a result, the Iraqi army melted back into their society with their weapons. We didn't even secure the stock piles of conventional weapons that have ended up in the hands of insurgents.

Cheney's years as Defense Secretary and a Cabinet member under past administrations failed to serve him or the nation in properly measuring the Iraqi resistance and implementing a workable plan for the occupation.

In assessing Cheney's performance, maybe we would have been better off if the Vice President didn't have as much experience, and the FBI, CIA, and Military personal with the right experience, with no political motives, advised the President.

To sum up, Cheney's supposed "experience" has demonstrated that he is an abject failure as a foreign policy adviser to the President and to our nation, and I didn't even mention Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. It made him and his friends richer.
No one else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddem43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. excellent post! I hope Sen. Edwards can use this kind of
argument in the debate, if there is one. Hopefully, old foul-mouth will be gone by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, No, for God's sake No.
I want Dick Cheney on that ticket. Did you see his numbers. He even divides the Repukes.

What a wonderful contrast between Cheney and Edwards. Please, oh please keep Cheney on the ticket and healthy until election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. FWIW
As much as I don't like Cheney, I would be remiss not to point out that the intelligence stovepiping on WMDs is all Rumsfeld's baby.
The halliburton pork barrel is all Cheney's, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. They market him as the co-President
He's suppose to advise the nit-wit drunken piece of shit on everything.

We always knew that Bush was incapable of running a lemonade stand. It was Cheney's experience that was going to keep us from disaster. I, of course never bought into this bull shit, but that was their line.

Cheney was supposed to tell Rumsfeld what to do, not the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. sorry, to clarify...
what I meant when I said it was all Rumsfeld's baby is that the idea of stovepiping (bringing cherrypicked intel to the top and discarding other intel that doesn't fit the agenda) came from him. Rumsfeld developed his own secret handpicked group within the intel community to do just that.

sorry for the confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. LOL, yeah Halliburton. Now that Dick "serves the public"
you'd think he could neogotiate some great deals for the taxpayer that he feigns concern for when talking about tax cuts.

Oooooppps. Did I say "serves"? I meant "services". :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. He did his job. His job was to enrich his friends via the war machine
and that's what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC